Most Read
Most Commented
Read more like this
mk-logo
From Our Readers

According to a news report in Sin Chew Jit Poh , the Malaysian Customs Department revealed in a Goods and Services Tax (GST) forum that petrol will not be exempted from GST.

Petrol is a government-subsidised product, imposing GST on petrol is akin to removing subsidy on petrol thereby burdening the people.

The subsidized price of RON95 is RM2.10 per litrs, imposing GST on RON95 will raise the price to RM2.23 per litrs and this is no different from removing 13 sen per liter of petrol subsidy.

I urge Najib Abdul Razak to review the decision to impost GST on petrol, and list petrol as a zero-rated product under GST to avoid increasing the burden of the people.

In an interview, senior assistant director of the Royal Malaysian Customs Department Isa Daud also said that Malaysia’s GST is a progressive tax rather than a regressive tax.

This is not only a misleading statement from Isa Daud but a desperate attempt from him to justify the implementation of GST. There is absolutely no doubt that GST is a regressive tax.

For example, a low-income earner with a monthly income of RM1,000 will most likely spend all his earnings, the amount of GST paid will be RM60, which is six percent of his monthly income.

On the other hand, a high-income earner with a monthly income of RM6,000 will be able to save most of his income. Assuming he saves RM3,000 and spend RM3,000, the amount of GST paid will be RM180 which is three percent of his monthly income.

While the government has listed some of the basic necessities as zero-rated item, it is unlikely that low-income earners will only consume zero-rated supplies.

In comparison to high-income earners who can afford to save part of their income, low-income earners will pay a higher proportion of GST.

This proves that GST is a regressive tax which place a higher burden on the lower income group.


CHONG ZEMIN is Perak DAP economic development bureau chief and political secretary to the MP for Taiping.

ADS