I refer to the Malaysiakini report Perak gov't collapses - BN claims power.

A government can only rule when it has the confidence of the rakyat (people). This confidence is represented through its representatives, in Perak’s case, its state assembly persons.

In this case, it appears that Barisan Nasional has got a slim majority of confidence in terms of its elected representatives.

However, if a government has lost the confidence of the rakyat, but still has the confidence of its legislative assembly, then it is the sultan’s (roughly translated to king’s) job to dissolve the state assembly to correct the misrepresentation in the assembly and seek a new mandate from the people.

And this is the case in Perak, namely because:

- The Election Commission (EC) acted outside its jurisdiction when it refused to call by- elections for the two vacated seats. The EC has no say in whether an election should be called or not, regardless of whether the resignations were genuine or not.

As far as the EC is concerned, if the speaker submitted two fake letters of resignation (which is not the case here), the EC would have to carry out elections while the two ‘fake-ly resigned’ representatives have the option of getting a court order to stop the by-elections.

Legally, these two seats are vacant because the speaker has said so, and no court has ruled otherwise, regardless of EC’s position.

I reiterate, the EC has no jurisdiction in deciding whether a seat is empty or not; that is the speaker’s job. And hence, from a legal perspective, these two seats are now classified vacant.

- My next argument rests on the sultan’s wise opinion.

For the three previously Pakatan seats (one DAP, two PKR), did the constituents vote for the candidate or the party?

My honest opinion on this matter is that many voters did not even care who was standing in the seat and they voted for the party.

If the Sultan agrees with me, that means the mandate of the people was given to the party, not the candidate, and that the people are not being accurately represented in the legislative assembly if their elected party gets changed without their consultation.

From my first argument, we can see that if BN forms the state government through the support of the two ‘illegally occupied’ seats, it has taken over the government illegally.

From my second argument, we can see that a BN government does not represent the will of the people.

And it is for these reasons, I conclude that the best viable solution is to dissolve the state assembly and call for new elections and therefore appeal for the Perak sultan to do so.