Malaysiakini News

Disturbing that whole truth not told on kidnap of S'wakians

P Ramasamy  |  Published:  |  Modified:

COMMENT Inaccuracies, contradictory statements and half-truths perpetrated by those in charge of the police, can only lead to the deterioration of the security situation of the country.

How can you put a stop to kidnapping when the police themselves are not revealing the truth about their actual involvement?

The inspector-general of the police (IGP) Khalid Abu Bakar denied that the ransom money to release the four Sarawakians from the captivity of the Abu Sayyaf militants, was given to the Special Branch.

He said in a press conference in Putrajaya yesterday that the police have no knowledge of the ransom money, and if at all the ransom was paid then it had something to do with their family members.

Khalid's statement comes as a direct contradiction to what was stated by Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Home Affairs Zahid Ahmad Hamidi.

A few days back, Zahid admitted that police received the money, which was then subsequently channeled to a Muslim welfare organisation in the Philippines, that had no relationship whatsoever with the militants.

Khalid did say that police were involved in the providing a safe passage for the family members of the kidnapped victims to travel to Zambaonga City in the Philippines, to negotiate with the kidnappers of their agents. Other than that, the police were not involved in the eventual release of the victims.

'Who is telling the truth?'

However, Khalid blamed certain political parties for publicising the collection of the ransom money and for influencing the militants to raise the ransom amount.

In the same press conference, Khalid, annoyed with the barrage of questions on the kidnap matter blurted out by saying, "I don't know and don't want to know".

Who is telling the truth, the minister in charge of police affairs or the head of the country's police force?

It is a sad day for Malaysia if those responsible for the country's security are not telling the truth to the public. Surely there is something that is amiss if these two high-ranking individuals are giving out differing information on the kidnap episode.

If the heads of the country's security apparatus are deeply divided in divulging the correct information to the public, then whom can the public turn to if there is another episode of kidnapping.

As it is, kidnap of Malaysians are on the rise in the waters of Sabah and the police seem helpless resolving the matter.

Hypothetically, if there is another case of kidnap, families and the next of kin will be invariably required to raise funds for another Muslim welfare body and the police, in the words of Zahid, will act as an intermediary.

The reputation of the Malaysian police has taken such a beating in the last few years. Surely, they don't need any other examples of infantile adventurism that will further affect their credibility and effective functioning.

Questions and more questions

The Malaysian government must address the following questions.

First, what was the actual role of the police in the kidnap episode?

Did they merely provide safe passage for the family members to travel to Zambaonga City or had a bigger role, such as channeling the collected funds to the militants or their agents?

Second, why are Zahid and Khalid making contradictory statements about the kidnap matter? Who is telling the truth and how much truth is being told? Are both of them hiding crucial information from the public?

Third, while we accept that the government does not believe in paying ransom money, but how on earth Zahid could have the temerity to tell that collected money was channeled to a Muslim welfare organisation?

Fourth, could Zahid name the so-called Muslim welfare body and whether it has any relationship with the Abu Sayyaf militants?

Fifth, it is well-known that the militants would not have released the victims without the payment of the ransom money. Did the police perform an intermediary role?

So after all, in an informal sense, the police went against the directive of the government in negotiating and condoning the payment of ransom?

Sixth, these contradictory statements and half-truths do not augur well for the security of the nation. In a more specific sense, it will only further embolden the militants to engage in further ransom seeking kidnaps.


P RAMASAMY is Penang Deputy Chief Minister II and DAP Perai assemblyperson.

Sign in


Welcome back,

Your subscription expires on
  

Your subscription will expire soon, kindly renew before
  

Your subscription is expired
  Click here to renew

You are not subscribed to any subscription package
  Click here to subscribe now

Any questions?
  Email: [email protected]
  Call: +603-777-00000

Renew