I refer to the article that appeared in The Star on the May 9, 2013 - ‘Girl, 13, agrees to marry 40-year-old who allegedly raped her'.

I am confused as to how we deal with crime in this country involving violence against children. It is statutory rape where an older man has sex with a minor who is below the age of 15.

There are numerous cases to show this.

There are young men languishing in prison after being convicted for statutory rape, despite many appeals.

There are a number of issues that are troubling and need answers. We are talking about child marriage. Do we as Malaysians support child marriage?

Look at the age gap. Is this fair to a child to marry someone who is old enough to be her father?

Then again what kind of message are we sending out to criminals, that they can rape and marry the girl. Where then is the meaning of ‘crime does not pay'?

What about the rights of the child?

The Convention of the Rights of the Child - for which Malaysia is a signatory, says that the child's wellbeing is of utmost importance above all else. Is marrying her off in her best interests?

She has lost her right to enjoy her future and choice in life. Society has failed to protect her rights and instead has placed her in captivity at the hands of an alleged criminal, who may later abuse her as well.

What kind of legal system are we practising in this country?

Is the child ready for the life of a wife? What if she becomes a mother at this young age and not of her choice?

Where are the adults and officers who according to the Child Act are so called protectors? Why are they all keeping quiet in this matter?

We cannot be selective in responding to crime nor have selective prosecution in matters involving children, where the law clearly has stated the action, procedure and punishment.

If we do not speak up for the rights of children then who will? What hope is there for children at the hands of abusers?