Adcin in his letter Mahathir exposed with Anwar's acquittal states that: 'Mahathir's claim of Anwar's homosexual habits had always been tenuous, even with privileged information.'

Adcin might be surprised to find, if he actually reads the Sept 2 judgment of the Federal Court, that the majority judges (the ones who acquitted Anwar and who are now hailed as the purest judges in Malaysia) do not agree with him.

This is because they pronounced as follows: 'We find evidence to confirm that the appellants (Anwar and Sukma) were involved in homosexual activities and we are more inclined to believe that the alleged incident at Tivoli Villa did happen.'

Remember that Anwar and Sukma were alleged to have sodomised driver Azizan Abu Bakar at the Tivoli Villa condominium. The judges did not dispute that allegation.

What they did find and so the reason for the acquittal was that the prosecution did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the incident took place on the dates stated in the charge sheets.