I refer to the Malaysiakini report Abdul Razak: Najib not involved.

This press conference of Abdul Razak Baginda, definitely raises many more speculations and perceptions. One that comes to one's mind is why are you speaking for someone else?

They are big enough to take care of themselves and there were ample opportunities for them to come forward and speak up and put to rest the many doubts and suspicions created in the public's mind.

Instead, they chose to make only denials and use their political position to avoid being cross- examined to be proven right or wrong.

Perhaps Abdul Razak, you were too isolated in prison to have actually known the various discriminatory statements and reports that were made during your detention which essentially, should have been thoroughly investigated and proven beyond reasonable doubt that they were false and vindictive and merely smear campaigns.

Alas, this was not the case and thus you cannot blame the public for thinking that there must be some strong influence to manipulate the case.

The big questions still remain as to who ordered the execution and where is Bala, a key witness to this case? The current accused and who are ordered to make their defence, could not have acted on their own to allegedly blow up a person who appears to be a total stranger to them. It points to someone out to protect his or her reputation and with a fear of being exposed.

Without Bala's testimony, the case is wide open and gives room for doubt.

Therefore Abdul Razak, we the public, surely smell a rat and like in the chess game, the pawns are allegedly made the victims of a despicable and heinous crime. It does not take an expert in the field of criminology to figure this out.

Abdul Razak by your press conference, it appears you want the public's sympathy in highlighting the 'ordeal' you went through while being locked up. But it is a far more traumatic for the family of the murdered girl who have lost a mother, daughter and sibling. It is an irreplaceable loss and those involved should not go scot-free and should bear the full brunt of the law.

You would have done greater justice to yourself by not commenting about this case at all. A person's guilt or innocence can only be proven in a court of law. You are also not in anyway qualified to speak up for someone else or to make any statement.

Thus your statements are purely your own personal opinions and not the truth nor evidence.

However, you could have entered a defence when there was a chance, to counter all these so- called perceptions, misconceptions and lies.

All we want to see is justice being done and the accused punished without any personal vengeance for anyone. Crimes that go unpunished by man, cannot escape the wrath of God and we are all answerable to Him, whoever we conceive Him to be.