Most Read
Most Commented
Read more like this
mk-logo
News
He speaks, but no remorse for dead ex-lover

YOURSAY ‘A woman, who was once his friend, is killed. And this is his response?’

 

Razak Baginda breaks silence, but riddle stays

                                            

CQ Muar: Abdul Razak Baginda sounded like an insane man talking incoherently, and compared the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder to non-related issues.

 

Noticeably, he suddenly went out of his way to defend PM Najib Razak with preposterous claims and denials. This leads us to believe that a recent secret discussion might have taken place between the two (Razak Baginda and Najib Razak).

 

Turvy: Abdul Razak’s smug arrogance probably comes with the knowledge that he can no longer be touched. A woman, who was once his friend, is killed. Not just killed, but killed in a manner so brutal that it defied imagination.

 

And this is his response? No remorse. Whether he is legally guilty or not, the woman came here because of him. Her journey to her death started outside his house. He has no regrets over his role in the events that led to this tragic case?

 

Only flippant, preposterous comparisons between the violent intentional killing of an ill-fated woman and the disappearance of an aircraft.

 

Abasir: While the load of crap that spilled out of the fornicator Abdul Razak's mouth has been recognised for what it is, there is the widely reported (and still outstanding) matter of a senior lawyer who took instructions from Najib to falsify a court document.

 

Late private investigator P Balasubramaniam's counsel Americk Singh's statement at a Bar Council meeting where he stated that Bala's second SD was prepared by one Cecil Abraham.

 

Two things are intriguing about that:

 

1. Why hasn't anyone implicated by Americk come out to deny or file action against him?

 

2. Why is the matter still being dragged on by the Advocates and Solicitors Disciplinary committee?

 

Wg321: Sirul must have ordered the Immigration Department director-general to delete the immigration records of Altantuya; and at the same time he just walked into a military camp at Sungai Besi and asked the storekeeper of the armoury to give him a few pieces of C4 explosives to blow up Altantuya to high heaven.

 

Is that what Abdul Razak wants to tell us? To Abdul Razak, this is a straightforward murder with no mastermind. To him, this is the work of "dracula, vampire, or werewolf".

 

In case Abdul Razak did not know how C4 explosives look like which blew up his ex-mistress into small pieces, here is a video clip .

Another video clip here shows a small piece of C4 explosive - the size of a soap bar - can do much damage, though in a sanitised form.

 

SRMan: Abdul Razak said, “Look at MH370, what, there was a conspiracy? Come up with the evidence. Nobody came up with the evidence. Things just happen. Bermuda Triangle. Certain things are just unexplainable. So why not this? That they just went on their own. Why not?"

 

Razak, what are you - a supposedly highly educated and political analyst - trying to say? If the two policemen had gone on their own, how was it possible for them to obtain C4 explosive to blow up the helpless victim into almost nothing-at-all? 

 

Then what about the erasure of the victim's entrance record at the Immigration office? Also the work of the two policemen? Razak, your explanations are hardly convincing at all.

 

Hplooi: So long as due diligence is not satisfied, doubts and rumours will abound in the public domain. While cases like this may contain elements which may very well be forever unknown (eg, MH370 case), not exerting sufficient due diligence is cause for doubts.

 

In the domain of civil law, insufficient due diligence is criminal negligence. Examples of insufficient due diligence in this case include:

 

1) The riddle of the missing immigration record.

 

2) The culpability of highly-trained officers attached as bodyguard to high government ministers with no apparent motive to kill.

 

3) The use of C4 (the lack of police’s standard operating procedure, etc).


4) The conundrum of the Abdul Razak Baginda-Altantuya-big boss-commanding officer-convicted murderer nexus.

 

By the way, what was your topic of research during your sojourn at Oxbridge, Mr Baginda?

 

Sirach: She was his lover. She was harassing him for money. She was rumoured to be pregnant.

 

He was at the zenith of his career. A close confidant to the the PM-in waiting. He was wealthy. And this woman, from Mongolia of all places, could bring that whole edifice crashing down.

 

Azilah and Sirul were cops trained to obey orders. They did not know the woman. They killed her.

 

The nagging question remained - why? Oh yes, of course, it was werewolves, vampires and Dracula who made them do it. How silly of us not to figure that one out.

 

It makes me recall late American comedian Flip Wilson's running joke when caught doing something naughty, "The devil made me do it!"

 

Thank you, Abdul Razak. The mystery is finally solved.

Did IGP ever ask duo why they killed Altantuya?


The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. Over the past one year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now .

These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as fact.

ADS