COMMENT | Let’s try to examine the case of Zakir Naik objectively.
Zakir is a controversial Islamic preacher from India, who was granted permanent residency in Malaysia.
India’s Enforcement Directorate is reportedly looking to extradite Zakir to India, as part of an investigation concerning Zakir and money laundering.
The preacher has stirred controversy in Malaysia more or less since his arrival, and this latest episode is proving to be something of a test for the new government.
It feels like many people are taking sides on the debate as to whether he should be extradited or not based on sentiment and a certain amount of prejudice.
There are many who support Zakir merely because they seem him as a stalwart of Islam, while there are many who have quickly bought into the image of him as a hate-spewing Islamic extremist.
A more objective consideration of the facts and the case at hand may yield a more nuanced perspective.
Having attempted such a consideration, I believe the question of whether or not Zakir should be extradited pivots more on legal and diplomatic concerns, than it does on what he has or hasn’t said in his speeches.
Said legal concerns include whether or not India is able to furnish conclusive evidence of wrongdoing and whether they decide to submit a formal extradition request.
Whether or not the latter comes to pass or not may be a problem for which diplomatic solutions may exist.
Let us begin by examining what Zakir is most famous for: his views on religion. If one were to skim only certain headlines, it would be easy to form the opinion that he is a religious bigot at best, and a supporter of violent terrorism at worst.
We often fall victim to confirmation bias, so if we already have a bad opinion of someone, we tend to interpret available data in a way that confirms our views - often without taking the time to read or watch things in full.
Let us turn to our generally reliable friend, Wikipedia, to see exactly what it is Zakir has been saying...
Unrestrained power in your hands
For almost 20 years, Malaysiakini has stayed true to the cause of providing the Malaysian public with the truth. We believe that with unadulterated information, the people will obtain power to make informed decisions.
Decisions which lead to a healthy, robust nation - ours!
Keep the truth alive. Support your robust, independent media. You have the unrestrained power to do so.
Who says it's not our fault?
We aren’t trained to take responsibility.
Everytime we observe an injustice - and choose to keep mum - the prevalence of injustice becomes our fault.
Astute journalism paves the way for the public to be continuously furnished with the fastidious truth. You are continuously empowered to act and to uphold the integrity of the nation.
The Rakyat owns Malaysiakini
We choose to take a risk on independent media because we believe that only through independent reporting can one be NOT beholden to the interest of businesses or organisations. This allows us to really pursue the truth - aggressively.
Independent for 20 years.
The victorious people
In the light of holding the truth to power, Malaysiakini will continue to uphold its mission of providing credible news to its discerning public. Your support for Malaysiakini is always treasured as a testament of innate nationalism. Your victory is our history.
Quietly. Effectively. Says it all. Malaysiakini.
Speaking truth to power
When we embarked on this journey 20 years ago, we knew we would face intimidation, harassment, raids, arrests and perhaps even jail terms. We got into this venture with our eyes wide open.
The main reason we have survived this long - when many others have folded - is partly because we are prudent in our finances. But while we may be tightfisted in our budgeting, we do not hold back when it comes to speaking truth to power and holding power to account. And certainly, this new administration will not stop us from continuing to do so.