MP SPEAKS | My role as an MP – Part 4: National Issues

MP SPEAKS | When I was first elected to office in 2013 as the Member of Parliament (MP) for Serdang representing the DAP, I promised my voters that I would focus on the four “Es” at the national level, namely “Elections, Economics, Education and the Environment”.

I choose to focus on these issues because I thought I had enough expertise on and was also passionate about several topics linked to them.

Prior to joining politics, I had published several election-related articles including on electoral malapportionment and the unfairness of the Malaysian electoral system and electoral manipulation in different countries was one of the areas discussed in my PhD thesis.

I was also trained in Economics at the Undergraduate and Master's levels and, together with my experience as a management consultant, I thought I could bring a unique perspective in parliamentary debates on the Malaysian economy.

Together with Tony Pua, I had blogged and written on a number of education-related issues including exposing the then vice-chancellor of University of Malaya for ‘boasting’ about UM being ranked 89th in the world when the ranking was due to an error of misclassifying the Chinese and Indian students in Malaysian universities as being international students.

Degree mills

While I did not have any specific expertise on environmental issues, there were some areas such as renewable energy, municipal waste management and river rehabilitation, which I was interested in and wanted to explore further.

When I was first started issuing press statements on these issues as an MP, the primary objective was to focus on the shortcomings and scandals involving ministers and decisions being made by individual ministries or their agencies.

My revelations that several ministers, deputy ministers and even MPs had obtained degrees from degree mills captured some headlines and resulted in my reputation as the “fake degree buster” among the opposition MPs.

My interactions with the Election Commission (EC) started even before I became an MP through the Malaysian Electoral Roll Analysis Project where I revealed many problems with the electoral roll including voters over the age of 100 and voters registered with the same old IC number, just to name a few.

Highlighting back-door registration of new voters by Election Commission 

When I became an MP, I continued to highlight many of the unfair practices carried out by the EC culminating in the unprecedented 2018 electoral delimitation exercise which was passed just prior to the 14th general election.

We are still feeling the consequences of that delimitation exercise with my parliamentary constituency of Bangi (P102) almost reaching 200,000 voters and would likely exceed 300,000 voters before the next general election if Undi18 and automatic voter registration were carried out concurrently.

I put my experience as a former management consultant to some use by asking for the consultancy fee paid to McKinsey and Co for the Malaysian Education Blueprint in 2013.

The parliamentary reply I received stated that the cost came up to RM20 million, an amount which I thought was unnecessary as the then government was already spending millions of ringgit on the Pemandu unit under Idris Jala, which also had an education transformation portfolio under the National Key Results Area or NKEA.

Writing these short statements often resulted in reports and articles by the online media with catchy headlines that drew the public’s attention to these issues.

But the academic in me also wanted to explain more complicated issues to the public including those that had to do with economics and finance. It was this desire which led to my collaboration with Teh Chi-Chang, the then executive director of the Research for Social Advancement (REFSA), a think tank, on a series of articles to debunk the ‘myth’ which was the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP).

Almost 10 years later, I stand by the articles I co-wrote with Chi-Chang. My research for the Pemandu series would go on to inform me on how to read between the lines when it comes to understanding government statistics and economic indicators, even when Pakatan Harapan was in power.

Poor public finances

One of my more memorable revelations as an MP was explaining how the Najib Abdul Razak government tried to ‘hide’ the amount of development expenditure in the budget by using a 100 percent-owned Ministry of Finance (MOF) entity known as Pembinaan PFI.

It took me a few months of research before I could understand how Pembinaan PFI was being used by the government to borrow money in a manner that was not transparently reflected in the budget, and it took a few years (and one or two reports by the auditor-general) before it was properly understood and reported by the media.

After the Pembinaan PFI revelation, I undertook the task of looking into the finances of some of the larger 100 percent MOF-owned entities. While not all of my research ended up as press statements for public consumption, I tried to use my research to explain why poor public finances were one of the reasons public transportation in Malaysia is more expensive than in Singapore.

I had students come to me later to say that they used my research on Prasarana as part of their process to better understand public transportation challenges in Malaysia.

I also channelled my interest in public finances and education policy into an in-depth study of the National Higher Education Loan Corporation, or better known as PTPTN, published under the Penang Institute.

Not everyone, including within my own party, agreed with some of the recommendations I proposed but I still stand by those findings. The issues I raised are more relevant now than ever given that PTPTN is one of the largest contingent liabilities (together with Dana Infra) currently held by the federal government.

Many of the press statements I issued touched on national issues and did not allow me to focus on these issues from the ground up by examining them through the lens of individuals or smaller groups.

To address this gap, I undertook projects that would allow me to see things from different perspectives. For example, I wanted to see and understand for myself the challenges which the homeless community in Kuala Lumpur were facing on a daily basis and also the effectiveness of the efforts to feed them and to help them.

Homeless people line up to get their daily food packs distributed by an NGO in Chow Kit. 

This involved going down to places like parts of Chow Kit and Kota Raya to talk to several people who were made homeless for various reasons. My colleagues and I also interview different NGOs that were feeding and doing outreach to the homeless in Kuala Lumpur.

I would probably adopt a more systematic approach if I were to do this study again but the resulting report, again published under the Penang Institute, was something quite different from the press statements that I was used to issuing as an opposition MP.

There were no quick fixes or easy answers to “solve” the problem of homelessness in our cities. Longer-term coordinated efforts were required.

One of the most enjoyable assignments I undertook as part of my ground-up research was visiting the Ulu Muda forest reserve in northern Kedah.

I wanted to understand why the preservation of the water catchment area here was instrumental to providing a clean and consistent water supply to Penang via the Muda River. Not only did I understand the issue better after visiting Ulu Muda and the nearby areas, I also experienced the unique flora and fauna in one of the most enchanting places in Malaysia.

Trying to influence direction at the Ministry of International Trade and Industry

The methods by which I try to understand national issues have evolved over time. When I was deputy minister at the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI), my focus was more on trying to influence the policy direction at the ministry and proper execution of publicly announced policies.

I did issue press statements but that was mostly to explain to the public certain nuances regarding specific MITI policies such as Industry 4.0.

Now that I am back in the opposition, I still issue press statements on my own, but there are more collaborative efforts too, whether it is joint press statements with some of my colleagues in the party and in Harapan, or joint briefing notes published under REFSA.

For example, my colleagues and I published a DAP policy position paper in July 2021 on 'Living with Covid-19' that was featured prominently in the Edge Weekly, the first time a policy paper published by an opposition party was given such coverage.

Together with my colleagues at REFSA, I have published several articles on how to manage the Covid-19 crisis better from a public policy perspective.

Fine-balancing act

The experience of having been in government has allowed me to have access to industry contacts as well as former colleagues in the civil service, including from my previous ministry and agencies.

This means that unlike before GE14, I am in a better position to help industry address and solve some of their issues with the government without having to resort to issuing press statements.

It is a fine-balancing act, which I am still trying to get used to. Where necessary, I will continue to issue public statements.

But more often than not, I find it more fruitful to try to find longer-term solutions to the problems brought up by individuals and industry, away from the public limelight.

Constructive inputs

I will continue to work with ministers from the opposite aisle such as Khairy Jamaluddin and others who are open to win-win initiatives that can benefit the public.

But where there are obvious policy flaws made by the government, my colleagues and I will also voice out our opinions without fear or favour.

In the next year or so before the next general election, I hope to provide constructive inputs in the following areas (and where the opportunity arises, to execute some initiatives too):

  1. Housing policies for workers, especially foreign workers in the Klang Valley
  2. Help to revive the hospitality, MICE (meetings, incentives, conferences, exhibitions) and food and beverage sectors, especially in my parliamentary constituency
  3. Play a role to re-start sporting events including events at the newly renovated running track in Bandar Baru Bangi
  4. Collect viewpoints and provide different inputs to the proposed Residential Tenancy Act, an important piece of legislation to protect the interest of landlords as well as tenants
  5. Advocate for more transparency in the auto insurance claims sector

Do you know the issues which your MP is advocating for?

ONG KIAN MING is the Bangi MP and DAP's assistant political education director. This is part three of a series by him to explain the roles and responsibilities of an MP using his experience as a reference point.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

Read more from this author :
Read more like this :
View Comments
Most Read
Most Commented
Most Recent