COMMENT | The recent Federal Court ruling dismissing Maria Chin Abdullah’s leave application to appeal in respect of the judicial review of a Syariah Court show-cause order for contempt raises serious concerns about the state of freedom of expression in Malaysia.

While the case reflects the complexities of our dual legal system under Article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution, it raises broader questions about whether Malaysians, particularly women, can engage in legitimate public discourse on issues of justice without fear of legal repercussions.

This case is neither merely about legal procedure, nor is it an attack against the syariah courts.

It highlights the need to continuously safeguard the space for public discussion, critique, and advocate for reform, especially on matters affecting women in the syariah justice system.

Criminalising public comment on judicial decisions risks silencing advocacy, limiting democratic discourse, and undermining the principle of accountability in all branches of the justice system.