COMMENT | Recent commentary on the proposed Urban Renewal Act (URA) raises valid concerns but also introduces several misconceptions that merit clarification.

At its core, the URA empowers redevelopment, regeneration and revitalisation of buildings that are unsafe, neglected or legally abandoned.

“Abandoned” includes stalled construction projects with no activity for six months, or projects already in receivership or winding up.

“Neglect” covers structures that pose health or safety risks. The URA is therefore a remedy for genuine urban decay rather than a licence for indiscriminate demolition.

Claims of forced displacement overlook the consent safeguards. Owners must...