S Thayaparan

It will be harder for establishment to impose their diktats on citizens.

At this point, I don't even think they want a non-Malay PM.

Never provoke the far-right by having dreams of equality.

Deputy IGP's claims of attempts to oust him hardly caused a stir.

Politicians always use language to divide people across class lines.

Real targets will eventually be people deemed on the 'wrong' path.

Ramasamy could've been formidable if he remained independent.

Flawed as he is, there's no alternative for non-Malays to vote.

PM's remark on Syariah Court's status elevation should be met with scepticism.

Why is govt staying silent when businesses in M'sia get threatened?

Truth is, all Malay parties used DAP to reverse their political fortunes.

Losing a high-profile figure in the optics game is a possibly crippling political move.

Do we really want anyone who agrees with fascists to lead discourse?

History shows non-Malay leaders ditched rights for ‘pragmatism’.

Religious misogyny and being a non-Muslim woman in this country.

Palestine children trauma is fodder for M'sian propaganda.

Mainstream political parties are indifferent to common people's struggles.

PM has rejected secular state idea, so why make PAS accept the view?

DAP is pandering to right-wing power brokers to remain in power.

Unlikely PAS will moderate its behaviour if it's part of govt.

Hate speech has always been the vulgar political, religious expression of the state.

Solidarity has always been a problem for the Indian community.

Constraining art because it offends some is the biggest social issue there is.

DAP should champion secularism and not seek populist appeal using religious sentiment.