
- LifetimeACTIVEINACTIVEEXPIRED
- Registered on:Renews on:Expires on:ACTIVEINACTIVEEXPIRED
- Subscribe
- Renew
- Extend Subscription
- Settings
- Contact Support
- Sign Out




UPDATED 1.50PM | The court dismisses Malaysiakini's appeal in a split 3-2 decision.

'I am not afraid because I am on the side of truth.'

The Appeals Court reduces the damages in the MP's suit against TV3 for linking him to the Lahad Datu intrusion in 2013.

Suit related to the Perkasa president's speech at his party's annual general meeting three years ago.

The former finance minister is suing blogger Raja Petra over a series of articles on the Penang undersea tunnel project.


The ex-Amanah veep had questioned the company over a water scheme project.


The Federal Court, contrary to the Court of Appeal's conclusion, found that the legal action was brought by Lim personally.

In July 2019, the Court of Appeal had reversed the High Court's decision for Perkasa to pay Lim RM150,000 in damages.

The suit was over a commentary written by Mujahid that was critical of the lecturer.

Defamation suit over an online article that touched on Husam Musa's resignation.


The former minister had filed a suit against Harakah over articles on Nur Sajat performing umrah dressed in telekung.


Zakir filed the suit in October last year claiming that Ramasamy had issued defamatory statements against him.

Mujahid claims articles in question were defamatory and malicious.

The Kuala Lumpur High Court rules his application has no merit.

The court allows Raveentharan's application because he and other witnesses are from Penang.

The Sungai Besar Umno chief's application is on the ground that the suit was premature.

MCA filed the RM100 million suit claiming that Lim Lip Eng issued a defamatory statement at the Parliament lobby on March 15, 2017.