Paradigm shift needed on growth to avoid haze
Let just connect the dots here by asking some questions.
Assuming there is a law enacted to prosecute the companies involved in causing the current fires in Indonesia, will the haze problem stop in the future?
Another big picture question is why there is a haze problem in big cities like Beijing even though they do not have forest fires?
Yes, the open burning in Indonesia is directly causing the haze problem at the moment, but that is just the tip of the iceberg. There are many issues here that needed to be factored into the haze equation.
Fact one is that we are rampantly clearing the precious lungs of the earth which is the rainforest and substituting it with monocrop palm oil plantations.
The second factor is that we are obsessed with the western "capitalistic" perpetual growth industrial development model, which continuously substitutes old rainforest land with new and fancy industrial or housing estates. This is a global phenomenon.
We need to shift our paradigm away from this current development model to be able to resolve this problem.
Anything shorter than that is a band aid hazy solution. What is the point of having the latest consumption goods when you are not able to go outside to enjoy a basic standard of life?
A paradigm shift of how the world is viewed happens in human history all the time.
For example; during the pre-colonial period, many of our grandparents' generation believed that were spirits living in the trees.
You can still see remnants of that belief nowadays where people make offerings like burning joss-sticks to please the spirits of a big tree.
People would bow and even ask for protection - usually for health and safety but sometimes for lottery numbers from the spirits in the big tree.
Fast forward to the post-colonial period when development was slowly taking off where chainsaws and bulldozers were plentiful. People just bulldozed everything to build big housing or industrial estates.
The old belief in tree spirits was dropped. The advent of technological advancement had shifted the paradigm so to speak.
Today a new paradigm or world view is needed to solve the present ecological crises like air and water pollution.
Soil erosion, flash floods, overuse of chemicals in our agriculture, loss of biodiversity in rainforest and oceans, hard waste/rubbish landfills, global warming and many other environmental problems cannot be solved using the old paradigm of unlimited economic growth.
That shift of paradigm might not necessarily mean that we have to go back to live in caves. It would mean that we need to take the environment as our main concern in whatever we do.
We keep trees because we appreciate that it gives us oxygen to us, shade and life to all other creatures that live on it.
It does not mean that we have to go back to the old practice of bowing to the big trees, but probably hug it instead!
DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng in a June 21 press statement said that DAP will be proposing an amendment to the Environmental Quality Act via an urgent motion in Parliament next week.
He sees the urgent need for Malaysia to take action against any Malaysian companies and foreign companies operating in Malaysia that contributed directly or indirectly in the trans-boundary fires in Indonesia.
Enacting stringent environmental laws is a way to to stamp out the current problem. Unfortunately the solutions put forth are only temporary band aid solutions.
Cloud seeding is one of those technological fixes that can give us only temporary relief. These are old paradigm solutions for a new problem that needs a new way of thinking.
In fact the two solutions suggested give the public the illusion that some company somewhere and some politicians will come out with the solution.
All we need to do is to go on as usual on highway 'Wawasan 2020'.
Let's go along with the "hazy" technological fixes and enactment of new stringent environmental laws as at the moment, I know that if I suggest something more radical, someone might accuse me of being a communist!
Mind you there are many other non-communistic ideologies around like Ghandi's "village republic", "deep and social" ecology, Schumarcher's "small is beautiful", or our local Kampung version of "kais pagi makan pagi".
Most would argue that we can't possibly turn back the clock. Let's look at possible solutions to the current crises, keeping the big picture in mind.
As things are we know that the haze is an annual fixture and even if the problem is solved it will re-emerge as we expand our city's boundaries in the near future.
Many metropolises in Asia have a different level of haze/pollution problem. It's just that the haze from Indonesia is hazing over the haze from our locally produced ones at the moment.
What about adopting the idea of sustainable development seriously from now on?
Factor in quality of life and environmental impact into the equation in all of our new development projects.
The economic factor is the only factor considered globally at the moment for many decades and it has led us to a dead end.
That's why the climate change crisis and global warming is priority on the global agenda.
Adopt immediate measures to combat air quality issues like; a moratorium of all logging activities on our remaining rainforest land in the country, no more big scale development project on hills, reclaim unused land and converting it into parklands especially in the city areas, increase use of public transport in all the capital cities, create a bicycle friendly city.
There are a host of other sustainable development measures that are being adopted globally.
Enact laws to include putting trees in between the parking bays of all big shopping mall car parks. A project to seriously re-green cities is required.
Cutting three carrots with one knife
Here is another cutting three carrots with one knife type solution.
Since we need to tackle the quality of life and environmental issues anyway, we might as well look at other problems that need urgent address and factor them in as well.
State governments can enact laws to make it compulsory for new estate developers to allocate green spaces for residents in the area to have leisure activities.
Draw a line on let's say in every 40 acres of a housing or industrial development project we need to have a 10 acres of park reserve.
In other words, no more clear felling of the 40 acres of proposed housing development projects as before.
The previous clear felling practice has been attributed as contributing to flash floods, landslides and soil erosion.
The gazetted 10 acres public land has got some influence on the micro climate of that housing estate. There is solid science data to proof this point.
If you believe in micro and macro economics, then try to extend that to micro and macro climate and environment.
The fact that by expanding the city boundaries through industrial and housing estate developments, we are creating more micro climate hot spots in the surrounding areas.
The micro climate hot spots created from clear tree felling, the pollution from transportation and industries and the haze give us a "triple whammy" impact on our health and wellbeing.
In redesigning our housing and industrial estates with an ecological and social consciousness, we are adopting a more sustainable model of development.
In other words, it's okay if we do not have economic growth year in year out.
Can you see how difficult it is for any government in this planet to survive in an election if there is an economic stagnation?
We might as well add in the first home buyer's race quota into the equation so that we are tackling the race relation issues as well.
Create community centres in the gazetted "green zones" where communities can organise group activities including allocation of small plots of land for organic farming activities for the residents.
Living in an eco-friendly housing estate and sharing of a common community activity space will help facilitate the national reconciliation project.
This is to counter the colonial period "new village" structure that shafted in a single race in an area.
The new village model has to be slowly phased out to give way to this type of eco-friendly development project.
I grew up in one of these new villages; it hardly had any trees around. The tin sheds or brick walls act like ovens and encourage the use of air-conditioners. A new eco-friendly revamp is needed here.
The health and wellbeing of our children can improve if there are green zones available for them to hang out and play especially in the city areas.
At the moment, the younger generation are all trapped in their homes doing unhealthy activities like playing computer games and watching TV.
They have to be driven elsewhere for activities and that can contribute to more pollution.
Children are also suffering a whole heap of health issues like diabetes and obesity due to lack of activities.
This 'green zone' is an ideal antidote to alleviate a potential epidemic of health and wellbeing issues in our young.
We can't afford to follow the Singapore's structural development model as it is a mental health trap. Statistics show that Singapore is one of the suicide capitals of the world.
We have the space that Singapore does not. Why does KL have to follow Singapore's style of development?
Since we have extra time indoors due to the haze and the planet's library in on our fingertips, start googling and look at the big picture.
Look into topics like the increase the ocean's acidity and the expanding ocean desert, expanding land desert, rainforest are lungs of the earth, coral bleaching, drift net fishing, Al Gore's ‘inconvenient truth', chemicals in our food chain, haze in Beijing and other cities, loss of biodiversity, and you will get a bigger picture to the haze problem.
A paradigm shift is overdue as we are in a new century. If we tackle the problem with our old paradigm, the problem will still be there.
The solutions mentioned above are just a temporary stop gap measures.
We are just delaying our planet's catastrophe of climate change which many scientists predict will be in this century.
In other words, the party is over, the question is; are we willing to stop and change direction on highway 'Wawasan 2020'?
Keep Malaysiakini independent!
Malaysiakini will be 18 this year. That we’ve survived this long is because of you.
Your support matters. A lot. Especially those who pay RM150 annually, RM288 biennially or RM388 triennially to keep Malaysiakini independent from government/opposition influence and corporate interests. Advertising alone will not keep Malaysiakini afloat.
Together, we’ve gone far. We’ve covered three prime ministers, four general elections, five Bersih rallies, and countless scandals. But the journey continues.
Help us deliver news and views that matter to Malaysians. Help us make a difference for Malaysia.