I agree with Wan Sou Hai ( Economist is right: Dr M developed Third World mentality ) that a ban o­n the Economist would be silly, although I have to confess an interest here: I have a

long-term subscription to the magazine.

However, whether it is DPM Abdullah Ahmad Badawi or Wan, I would like to point out the massive self-denigration that underlies this notion of 'Third World mentality'.

What is a 'Third World mentality'? Does calling for changing 'French fries' to 'freedom fries', or tossing French wine down the gutter and boycotting it qualify as 'Third World mentality'? Or BBC TV's celebration of the impact of this boycott of French wine o­n Chirac's standing with French wine producers?

How about boycotts and death threats to the Dixie Chicks, and statements such as "America, love it or leave it"? Or President Bush's "you are either with us or against us"?

The point is that authoritarian characteristics are not some peculiarity of the so-called Third World. It is everywhere, especially with governments.

Sadly, however, Wan is wrong in thinking that rebuttals and exposure of inaccuracies bring respect, while demands for apology or bans result in derision. That depends o­n the power o­ne commands.