LETTER | I am surprised that Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said he would ask Transport Minister Liow Tiong Lai and Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nancy Shukri to hear the grouses of cabbies and their opposition to e-hailing services such as Grab and Uber.
This came after calls by Big Blue Taxi Services founder Shamsubahrin Ismail, who has threatened to withdraw support for BN if the government proceeds to support Uber and Grab.
But it is a case of “nasi sudah jadi bubur” (rice turned into porridge) with the passing of amendments to the Land Public Transport Act 2010 and the Commercial Vehicles Licensing Board Act 1987 in the Dewan Rakyat last July.
Before that, the Land Public Transport Commission (Spad) had already engaged and taken note of all the grievances and objections raised by taxi companies and drivers, but proceeded to introduce a bill to legalise e-hailing services for the best interest of our nation and public at large.
E-hailing services were introduced in 2014, and there had been numerous protests by taxi drivers, particularly those adamant in clinging on to the status quo that the public depend on their service so that they could dictate terms.
During the three-year period between introduction and regulation of e-hailing services, half of the taxi drivers had migrated to Grab or Uber, as they were willing to accept lower than regulated fares but get to run more trips and earn higher income.
The drop in taxi orders had affected the sales of Proton cars last year at 70,991 units from 72,291 sold the previous year, whereas Honda increased from 91,830 to 109,511 for the same period.
Drivers who wish to continue driving taxis for a living may apply for individual permits when exiting the rental-purchase agreement with taxi companies, and those qualified may receive a RM5,000 grant for the purchase of a new taxi.
Taxi companies may continue with operating taxi apps to facilitate their drivers to receive bookings through e-hailing, and these taxi drivers may also receive bookings through Grab or Uber and have equal chance with private cars if they are willing to accept the same rates.
Taxi companies may also choose to apply for the “Business Intermediation Licence” and add private cars to their e-hailing service and compete with Uber and Grab.
As such, there is no need to entertain any taxi company or individual, more so with the deployment of two cabinet ministers.
Taxi drivers used to be more influential in the old days such as the 1960s and 1970s when bus services were poor and many people relied on licensed and pirate taxis. Many of these drivers were chatty and people illiterate. As such, they wielded an influence over the local population.
By in this day and age, few people have time to listen to others and even coffee-shop talk has been relegated to history. Today, information and influence is governed by social media.
I had driven taxis in the Klang Valley for a decade and noticed most of them were working like lone rangers, with some fond of spending time at tea stalls. Few taxi drivers have time to join activities of taxi associations, and those active are just a few with the leaders highly vocal to be heard in order to gain popularity, and many like to claim they represent large number of taxi drivers.
As for Big Blue Taxi Services, it is just a taxi company that monopolised taxi services in KLCC and denied other taxi drivers from picking up passengers there. There is no love lost between this taxi company and city cabbies in Kuala Lumpur.
It would be wrong to stereotype taxi and e-hailing drivers, and protesting taxi drivers do not reflect the majority, as most of them think and act independently.
It would be a mistake to patronise those who are vocal, as it would shore up their credibility and boost their ego. But many will be exploited by politicians in the run-up of the general election and used as pawns.
A flare-up could easily cause hundreds of taxis jamming a street, station or airport.
The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
Unrestrained power in your hands
For almost 20 years, Malaysiakini has stayed true to the cause of providing the Malaysian public with the truth. We believe that with unadulterated information, the people will obtain power to make informed decisions.
Decisions which lead to a healthy, robust nation - ours!
Keep the truth alive. Support your robust, independent media. You have the unrestrained power to do so.
Who says it's not our fault?
We aren’t trained to take responsibility.
Everytime we observe an injustice - and choose to keep mum - the prevalence of injustice becomes our fault.
Astute journalism paves the way for the public to be continuously furnished with the fastidious truth. You are continuously empowered to act and to uphold the integrity of the nation.
The Rakyat owns Malaysiakini
We choose to take a risk on independent media because we believe that only through independent reporting can one be NOT beholden to the interest of businesses or organisations. This allows us to really pursue the truth - aggressively.
Independent for 20 years.
The victorious people
In the light of holding the truth to power, Malaysiakini will continue to uphold its mission of providing credible news to its discerning public. Your support for Malaysiakini is always treasured as a testament of innate nationalism. Your victory is our history.
Quietly. Effectively. Says it all. Malaysiakini.
Speaking truth to power
When we embarked on this journey 20 years ago, we knew we would face intimidation, harassment, raids, arrests and perhaps even jail terms. We got into this venture with our eyes wide open.
The main reason we have survived this long - when many others have folded - is partly because we are prudent in our finances. But while we may be tightfisted in our budgeting, we do not hold back when it comes to speaking truth to power and holding power to account. And certainly, this new administration will not stop us from continuing to do so.