Most Read
Most Commented
Read more like this
mk-logo
From Our Readers
Will crispy chicken rendang diplomacy ever apply to water?

LETTER | When UK Masterchef’s John Toude riled up Malaysians, Singaporeans, Indonesians and even Bruneians by saying that chicken rendang should be crispy, he achieved what no diplomat has achieved since Asean over insult on a much-loved dish: unity.

The regional uproar over food, however, does not apply towards water scarcity.

Singapore relies on Malaysia for 60 percent of their water which makes them at the mercy of the state of Johor’s water management system. Jakarta, Indonesia is experiencing water scarcity from years of drilling directly from their groundwater aquifers.

Even Brunei has water scarcity in certain areas. The truth is, none of the Asean countries can stand alone in solving their water scarcity, supply, distribution and sanitation problems. And yet there is no successful regional collaboration in addressing this issue.

In 2016, World Vision International launched an initiative called Asia P3 Hub which focuses on water, sanitation and hygiene in Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Myanmar, and the Philippines.

The fact that such an initiative exists is an acknowledgement that there is a problem that the countries could not solve on their own. On the private sector, Singapore launched their business-oriented once every two years Singapore International Water Week, which is happening this year.

There is an understanding that water scarcity is a regional problem and collaboration, instead of focusing on national interest would result in a win-win situation instead.

Water is so essential that the World Economic Forum has predicted that a global food crisis could be triggered due to a worsening water security situation in the next 15 to 20 years, with shortfalls of up to 30 percent in rice and other cereal production.

Back home, the water concern in Malaysia is arguably both supply and consumption of water. We consume too much, and demand is growing to the point that our supply simply could not keep up with growth.

According to Malaysia Water Industry Guide 2017, in 2016 the output capacity (ability to produce treated water) from water treatment plants for the state of Penang had the highest water reserve margin at 34.1 percent, followed by Labuan (29.2 percent); Perak (28.7 percent); Terengganu (27.2 percent); Negri Sembilan (22.1 percent); Pahang (21.4 percent); Sarawak (20.7 percent); Melaka (20.1 percent); and, Johor (16.4 percent). Our national water margin average is at 13.2 percent. Selangor had only 4 percent.

Let’s focus on Selangor, Malaysia. The most recent water crisis hit Selangor hard. When a surge water system in Water Treatment Plant SSP 3 exploded, it caused extensive damage which sent six engineers and technicians to the hospital.

It also left roughly 427 areas or 500,000 accounts in the Klang Valley high and dry. The reason being simply because Selangor does not have enough water reservoirs or buffer zone to accommodate emergencies when it happens.

This has severe repercussions on our economic growth. Malaysia’s Real Estate and Housing Development Association (Rehda) recently released a statement saying that more than 700 developed properties in the Klang Valley could not attain Certificates of Completion and Compliance (CCCs) due to problems related to the water supply.

Some 400 homeowners in Selangor and 300 homeowners in Kuala Lumpur could not move into their completed homes.

The Selangor Menteri Besar Azmin Ali, however, said there was no water shortage because the state completed the RM177.5 million Semenyih 2 Water Treatment Plant in Dengkil on March 1. It was merely the accident that caused the recent water disruption.

Fact remains that there needs to be recognition that current water woes is beyond the state and even the national body’s ability to solve on our own. We need help. We need expertise, more importantly, we need political will to solve a problem instead of pointing fingers towards one another.

Malaysia could seek out collaboration with Asean countries in order to address water concerns in a more effective manner. There is a need for an Asean Water Governance Index which is taken seriously as a comparative yardstick to see whether public service is done properly.

There should be more planning, design and technology sharing between countries, particularly those interconnected in water resource and supply like Johor, Malaysia and Singapore.


The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

ADS