Judge in Anwar trial misdirected himself, says lawyer

comments     Arfaeza A Aziz     Published     Updated

Anwar Ibrahim's conviction for sodomy should have been set aside because his co-accused Sukma Darmawan Sasmitaat Madja was used against him, the Court of Appeal heard today.

Lawyer Karpal Singh ( photo ) submitted that High Court judge Arifin Jaka misdirected himself when he relied o­n Sukma's confession to find the ex-deputy premier guilty of the offence.

"A confession of a co-accused cannot be made a base of a conviction for the other accused. A confession can o­nly be taken (into consideration) to support an existing strong evidence," he said.

Karpal said the judge can o­nly consider the confession after he was convinced that the prosecution has submitted enough evidence to support its case beyond reasonable doubt.

For the rest of this story and more, subscribe for only RM150 a year. If you're already a subscriber, please sign in.

Sign in Subscribe now


Malaysiakini
news and views that matter


Sign In