AG who prosecutes sitting PM may get fired, says ex-judge
No attorney-general (AG) will prosecute a sitting prime minister as he risks losing his job, said a former appellate court judge.
Speaking in general terms, Mohd Noor Abdullah, who is also a constitutional expert, said this is because the AG is appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on advice of the prime minister and can also be sacked in the same manner.
No attorney-general (AG) will prosecute a sitting prime minister as he risks losing his job, said a former appellate court judge.
Speaking in general terms, Mohd Noor Abdullah, who is also a constitutional expert, said this is because the AG is appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on advice of the prime minister.
"No AG will prosecute the prime minister as the PM can retaliate by advising the Agong to sack the AG," he told a press conference at the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) headquarters in Putrajaya today.
He pointed out that because of how the constitution had changed under former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad, the Agong must follow the prime minister's advice.
Mohd Noor's remarks came two days after AG Mohamed Apandi Ali announced that Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak would not be charged for any offences regarding the SRC International, and the RM2.6 billion issues.
When commenting on the decision Apandi had said his decision cannot be challenged as the federal constitution grants him absolute discretion whether or not to prosecute.
In his personal capacity, Mohd Noor, who is also an MACC adviser, disputed this, saying that the AG's powers are not absolute.
"As AG your power is not absolute. You can decide, but you are answerable to the public," he said.
The former judge said the AG can also be brought to court if he had acted in bad faith.
However, Mohd Noor believes Apandi had not acted out of line, believing the AG had acted in good faith, after reviewing the MACC's investigation papers thoroughly.
On the same note, he does believe that Apandi should allow the MACC to continue its probe until it can really close the case.
"When he says ‘close the case, don't proceed’, the AG has overstepped his powers a little," Mohd Noor said, adding that the AG's job is to prosecute, not investigate.
In his opinion, when the MACC advisory panel urged the graftbuster to engage Apandi, it was a polite way of saying that it was not happy with him ordering a halt to the investigations.
Related story
MACC can challenge Apandi in court
So Apandi, dead kings tell no tales?
Why return RM2b when we need it to fight extremism?
Najib and his billions - beyond mere guilt or innocence
Case closed, get on with life, but says who?
Firm set up a month before RM27m transfer to PM's account
Medium: Sarawak Report's post on Najib stays despite ban
The many twists and turns in trail of RM2.6b
WSJ: 1MDB Goldman banker goes on leave
Report: AG ignored MACC advice to charge Najib
Engage AG for explanation, panels tell MACC
Stop being 'ungrateful', respect AG's decision: Cheras Umno
Ambiga to AG: More you hide, people will be more suspicious
Reform needed as AG juggles conflict of interest: think-tank
AG has no power to direct MACC to close files, says veteran lawyer


Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This action cannot be undone.