'If intention of sedition is irrelevant, then this law is unconstitutional'

Hafiz Yatim

Modified 1 Jun 2016, 8:50 am

Section 3 (3) of the Sedition Act 1948 is unconstitutional because there is no need to prove the intention of the maker of sedition as it is considered irrelevant, a lawyer argued in the Court of Appeal today.

N Surendran said the Sedition Act is there to allow restrictions within interest of public order, hatred and disaffection. However, that section restricts freedom of speech.

All Access Plan
starting from


per month
Subscribe Now
You can cancel anytime.
Get unlimited access to our articles on web and apps
Add comments to our articles
Bookmark articles to read later
We accept
Student or Senior Citizen? Get a special rateGroup / Institutional / Corporate Plans
Already Subscribed?
Sign In