The Court of Appeal today dismissed an appeal by Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad to reinstate his lawsuit in which he seeks a declaration to invalidate a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) report into foreign exchange losses suffered by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) in the 1990s.

Justice Ahmadi Asnawi, who chaired a three-member panel, held that the findings of the RCI are not subject to challenge.

He said what Mahathir is challenging are the findings of the RCI itself as contained in the RCI report.

Hence, Justice Ahmadi said, the Federal Court decision on the RCI into the controversial video clip case of former lawyer VK Lingam applies to Mahathir's case.

In 2011, the Federal Court ruled that the findings of the RCI into the Lingam (below) video clip could not be reviewed as the commissioners have merely made findings and not a decision.

Justice Ahmadi, who presided with Justices Lau Bee Lan and Has Zanah Mehat, said Section 22 of the Commissions of Enquiry Act 1950 provides a wide discretion to the RCI to regulate its own affairs and its own procedure, including on the compilation of the report, and regulations for presentation of the report to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

"We are also of the view that it is not the role of this court to tell the RCI how to run its affairs because Section 22 of the act is very wide to govern the conduct," he said.

The panel affirmed that Dec 17, 2018, High Court decision to strike out Mahathir's originating summons in which he seeks a declaration that the RCI report on BNM's forex trading losses is invalid, incomplete and defective as it excluded the legal documents of witnesses, notes of proceedings, written and oral submissions.

In his suit filed in December 2017, Mahathir also wants the court to declare that any report by the RCI set up under the Commission of Enquiry Act will only be legal if it had all the written statements by the witnesses who testified in the proceedings, as well as the notes of the proceedings and submissions.

He named the RCI chairperson Mohd Sidek Hassan, its members comprising Kamaludin Md Said, Tajuddin Atan, Saw Choo Boon, K Pushpanathanan and Dr Yusof Ismail, former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak, cabinet members and the government, as defendants in the suit.

Mahathir's counsel, Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla, earlier submitted that his client was not seeking to quash the findings of the RCI, but wanted a declaration that the report would only be complete and valid if it contained the relevant documents.

However, senior federal counsel Mazlifah Ayob, appearing for the respondents, argued that if the RCI report is declared null and void, the RCI's findings and recommendations will also be declared null and void, and that the Federal Court decision in the RCI Lingam video clip case is applicable to Mahathir's case.

- Bernama