Malaysiakini
NEWS

Festival of Lights remains dim for some

Shamini Darshni Kaliemuthu

Published
Modified 26 Oct 2019, 11:12 pm

COMMENT | This will be the 15th Deepavali that the family of Mainthan Arumugam is celebrating without him.

Once again, the 49-year-old will not be there to wake his children in the morning, give them the traditional oil bath, join them for prayer and share happiness and love at a time meant to be spent with family and friends.

Instead, Mainthan now sits in solitary confinement, where he is allowed out for an hour a day. 

His wife, Gunalakshmi Karupaya, is a single mother struggling to raise four teenagers with an income of just RM1,000 – with all of them living in cramped dilapidated house in Kuala Lumpur. Fifteen years raising a family without a husband who may well be a victim of flawed justice.

Mainthan might face each day alone, but he is not the only one. He is among 1,294 death row prisoners in Malaysia, a case highlighted in our recently published report, “Fatally Flawed: Why Malaysia Must Abolish the Death Penalty”.

The house that Mainthan Arumugam's family lives in

Among the various issues underscored in the report, a key concern is access to fair trials, including restrictions on access to competent and effective legal counsel, delays in notification of arrest, the lack of legal representation, ill-treatment, torture and abuse in detention, and forced confessions.

There is also an unreasonably high threshold before a concluded case can be reviewed, despite the fact that new evidence has come to light, as it did in Mainthan’s case. “Fatally Flawed” also looks at the people who are on death row and finds that most come from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds. Certain ethnic minorities are also overrepresented on death row.

Murder victim resurfaces

Mainthan’s case is such a sad and strange case and raises some serious questions about our criminal justice system.

The High Court of Shah Alam convicted and sentenced him to death for the murder of an Indian national which occurred in August 2004. Three others were initially convicted and sentenced to death with him, but they later had their convictions overturned by the Federal Court in 2014.

They stated at trial and on appeal that they had been beating another man on the night in question, whom they thought had stolen items from the shop owned by Mainthan.

This man was subsequently taken to hospital and treated, but later could not be traced to come forward as a witness for the defence.

The trial judge doubted the existence of this man and dismissed this defence as an “afterthought”, since it was not raised when the prosecution produced its evidence in the first part of the trial. The appeal courts concurred.

On 26 March 2017, three years after the Federal Court upheld Mainthan’s conviction and sentence, the same man whom he supposedly killed attended Mainthan’s mother’s funeral, then learned about Mainthan’s conviction and death sentence.

He signed a statutory declaration to support the reopening of the case, detailed how he had moved to another state and he feared for his safety when he was asked to appear in court, since he did not understand the nature of the judicial proceedings. However, the Federal Court has rejected application for the review of the case.

This case reeks of multiple inconsistences. An innocent man could very well be living in a cell for 15 years through no fault of his own. A terrifying thought, quickly followed by another: Is he the only one?

Government must act

“Fatally Flawed” finds various issues with death penalty trials, chiefly, whether processes have been fair and competent.

Too many incidents reveal that there are some serious concerns with the justice system: restrictions on access to competent and effective legal counsel, delays in notification of arrest, the lack of legal representation, ill-treatment, torture and abuse in detention, forced confessions, and a lack of procedure to reopen concluded cases although new evidence has come to light.

I often wonder, of the 469 people that Malaysia has hanged in the name of justice since 1957, how many were innocent?

Luckily, the Malaysian government is observing a moratorium on executions, and Mainthan, along with other death row inmates, will not hang.

Still, there are some serious, pressing issues with the criminal justice system that the Malaysian government must answer for. Flaws must be tackled.

Amnesty International has made a total of 27 recommendations in “Fatally Flawed” to the Malaysian government, the inspector-general of police, the judiciary, the state Pardons Boards, the Parliament and to the international community. 

We urge that these recommendations be considered and addressed. Almost every week, someone is being sentenced to death. There are lives at stake.

As kuttuvilukku are lit in the homes of Hindus, as Malaysians celebrate the Festival of Lights and as we enjoy a public holiday on Monday, do let us remember the ones often forgotten.


SHAMINI DARSHNI KALIEMUTHU is the executive director of Amnesty International Malaysia.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

Share this story

Comments

By posting a comment, you agree to our Terms & Conditions as stipulated in full here

TERMS & CONDITIONS

Foul language, profanity, vulgarity, slanderous, personal attack, threatening, sexually-orientated comments or the use of any method of communication that may violate any law or create needless unpleasantness will not be tolerated. Antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be suspended. Violators run the risk of also being blocked permanently.

REPORT VIOLATORS

Please use the report feature that is available below each comment to flag offending comments for our moderators to take action. Do not take matters in your own hands to avoid unpleasant and unnecessary exchanges that may result in your own suspension or ban.