PSM unhappy with court decision to dismiss US embassy ex-guard's case

Modified 8 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm

PSM has expressed dissatisfaction over a Kuala Lumpur High Court decision to dismiss the case of a purported unlawful dismissal of a former security guard at the US embassy.

The High Court judge Nordin Hassan had today ruled in favour of the US government in their application and quashed a referral by Human Resource Minister M Kulasegaran in ordering the case of Subramaniam Letchimanan to be referred to the Industrial Court.

"PSM strongly feels that the court has failed to protect a simple security guard seeking justice from a powerful country.

"With this judgement, it means the thousands of Malaysian citizens working in foreign embassies all over the country will have no protection under Malaysia's law.

"Subramaniam will appeal against this unjust judgement...therefore, it is good to get the matter finally settled at the Appeal Court.

"PSM also urges the Human Resource Minister to continue to appeal and fight this decision because it jeopardises the rights of Malaysian workers," said PSM deputy chairperson S Arutchelvan in a statement today.

It was previously reported that in May 2019, Subramaniam will finally have his case heard before the Industrial Court after 11 years.

The former security guard at the US embassy had worked there for over 20 years when he received a phone call from his supervisor on April 4, 2008, informing him that he had been terminated with immediate effect.

A month after he was terminated, Subramaniam lodged a report with the Industrial Relations Department (IRD) under Section 20 of the Industrial Relations Act for unlawful dismissal.

PSM, who had been helping Subramaniam push for his case since 2008, said they wrote to Kulasegaran in July 2018, after which a reconciliation meeting was called.

The case was then heard before the Kuala Lumpur Industrial Court in May 2019.

Arutchelvan claimed in the statement today that the US government has since made all efforts to fight the dismissal by invoking diplomatic immunity under the Vienna Convention 1966 as well as under Article 31 Act 636 where the US embassy has legal immunity from criminal and civil suits when they are conducting official duty.

The court today then ruled that the US government has immunity, with the US naming the Human Resource Minister as the first respondent, the Industrial Court as the second respondent and Subramaniam as the third respondent.

PSM said Subramaniam was represented today by Ragu Kesavan and Liew Chih Ching while the minister was represented by senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin and the US government was represented by Lim Heng Seng and Amardeep Singh.

Arutchelvan said Ragu had argued that the case must be heard under Malaysian jurisdiction and the US does not have absolute immunity and cited UN, EU and UK examples that support such cases does not give the foreign government immunity over local laws.

Share this story


By posting a comment, you agree to our Terms & Conditions as stipulated in full here


Foul language, profanity, vulgarity, slanderous, personal attack, threatening, sexually-orientated comments or the use of any method of communication that may violate any law or create needless unpleasantness will not be tolerated. Antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be suspended. Violators run the risk of also being blocked permanently.


Please use the report feature that is available below each comment to flag offending comments for our moderators to take action. Do not take matters in your own hands to avoid unpleasant and unnecessary exchanges that may result in your own suspension or ban.