Prosecution stands with AG on unconstitutionality of Sosma provision

Hidir Reduan Abdul Rashid


The prosecution confirmed in court today that it takes the stance that a Security Offence (Special Measures) Act 2012 provision that denies courts from considering bail for those accused of terrorist-linked cases is invalid and unconstitutional.

DPP Muhammad Saifuddin Hashim Musaimi said this to the High Court in Kuala Lumpur during the mention of the bail application by restaurant owner B Subramaniam, who faces a terrorism charge linked to the defunct Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

Saifuddin was referring to Section 13 of Sosma, which forbids the courts from considering bail applications from those charged with security offences, such as the LTTE-linked terrorism cases against Subramaniam and 11 other individuals...

Share this story


By posting a comment, you agree to our Terms & Conditions as stipulated in full here


Foul language, profanity, vulgarity, slanderous, personal attack, threatening, sexually-orientated comments or the use of any method of communication that may violate any law or create needless unpleasantness will not be tolerated. Antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be suspended. Violators run the risk of also being blocked permanently.


Please use the report feature that is available below each comment to flag offending comments for our moderators to take action. Do not take matters in your own hands to avoid unpleasant and unnecessary exchanges that may result in your own suspension or ban.