I refer to Justice's letter Anonymity doesn't discount Dapsy irregularities.

I agree that Justice has the right to remain anonymous. After all, my contention is not against his anonymity but the authenticity of his claim. But the credibility of any accusation is diminished by anonymity. If one wants to give weight to his claim, then he should reveal himself.

Even without giving up his anonymity, Justice should at least give more specific details of various irregularities in the party which allegedly affected him.

Unless Justice can provide more details, can his allegations be taken seriously? Can the matter can be thoroughly investigated just based on the contents of his letter?

As for the issue of the unsigned accounts tabled and approved at the Dapsy annual meet recently, how is it that Justice knows about this when he earlier claimed thrown out as a delegate?

Justice must have more consistency in his allegations.