LETTER | I read the comment from Liew Chin Tong lambasting analysts as being biased and justifying a Barisan Nasional victory. In fact, just the day before, Bersatu’s strategic director Rais Hussin did the same.

I’ll start with the main question - who are they trying to convince?

Liew is correct in saying that if Pakatan Harapan should win over 50 percent of the Malay vote, they would win the next general election. Yet, herein lies the problem - Harapan does not have that vote.

And here is something he is perhaps less keen to admit, his side lost a lot of Malay votes when it dumped PAS, while their replacements Bersatu and Amanah are not yet gelled together nor gained the momentum of membership to take on both PAS and Umno.

Thus, if anything, his analysis is biased towards not counting the fact that PAS supporters will be the kingmakers in the next general election.

And we saw this immensely during two showpiece gatherings by the opposition supporters; both Bersih and the anti-kleptocracy rally - both of which did not have the numbers to impress, even if you had compared it to the lesser Blackout 505 rally.

The word on the ground is that the Malays are now divided three ways between PAS, Umno and Harapan. Even giving each an equal share of the Malay votes, it would be a 33 percent split among them.

Yet, Liew believes Harapan can secure an additional 17 percent from PAS or Umno, while somehow maintaining the waning non-Malay vote, which is also another concern.

He has forgotten that there is also fatigue enough to end up stopping people from voting altogether due to the teaming up with Bersatu, mostly due to the disapproval of Mahathir Mohamad being the leading voice in this campaign.

While the media was keen enough to point out that this has affected mainly Chinese voters to the point of forming Facebook groups, it may in fact be symptomatic among all Malaysians, especially the youth population.

This can be seen by how 40 percent of youth voters are not keen to even register themselves. Thus, Harapan is hosting voter registration rallies on a monthly basis if not weekly, focusing on malls and markets, hopefully nationwide.

But more to the point, it is hypocritical to lambast analysts for having a point of view. Are things so dire in the outlook that Harapan and Liew (photo) need to convince voters by hitting out at any analyst who says otherwise?

Is denial Harapan's new propaganda tool?

Has this become the new propaganda tactic by the Harapan coalition, to the point that any analysis giving a contrary viewpoint to what is done by their own internal polling and sponsored research institutes must be discredited to stop voters from leaving them?

Isn’t that interestingly desperate?

Yes, people are unhappy with the way things are run, but if Harapan was so convinced that they had the 50 percent Malay votes, it certainly doesn’t show. In fact, I would say that the Malay vote will be fractured between two major parties - PAS and Umno.

This is because Umno managed to secure the Malay voters more recently by standing up for Jerusalem and Palestine, while DAP supporters discredited the move by laughing at the thought of us leading a peacekeeping mission by insinuating it was a military challenge against Israel.

At the same time, PAS inching towards their promise to strengthen sharia law through RUU355 has further consolidated their support base and even some of Umno’s own fence sitters. Additionally, the recent headscarf row among both hotel staff and stewardesses, also helps in infiltrating the Malay voters.

If Liew was serious about somehow winning the Malay vote, these are issues of support among the group of voters he’s trying to cater to - shifting religious conservatives further right. Which is perhaps why Amanah’s women decided to support a ban on “Despacito” on public radio.

Liew once predicted a Malay tsunami which would happen in the next general election. The major problem with his viewpoint is that he believes that the voters from PAS are still in his corner. Either that, or he believes that Bersatu and Amanah have managed to retain those votes given in GE13.

Both assumptions are very, very misleading. Therefore, if Liew and Harapan believes that he can somehow secure 50 percent of the vote without the oldest Malay opposition party in the country that brought them the crowd in all their gatherings, the rural votes and even stopped them from voting for the Budget bill in parliament, then perhaps it is not the analysts who are blindly justifying their points.

Perhaps it is instead, Liew and Harapan itself.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.