Malaysiakini
NEWS

Raub gold mine loses appeal against Bukit Koman resident

Hafiz Yatim

Published
Modified 13 Feb 2019, 8:00 am

A five-member Federal Court bench today unanimously dismissed the appeal by Raub Australian Gold Mine (RAGM) against Bukit Koman resident and activist Shirley Hue Shieh Lee over two articles published regarding residents' comments over fears of their safety.

Federal Court judge Ramly Ali ruled that RAGM had failed to prove the two articles were defamatory of the company.

In the first article carried by a news portal, the judge said he agreed it did not prove that the survey results conducted by the residents were false.

"We concluded and cannot see how those words in the first article had exposed the appellant (RAGM) to hatred, contempt, ridicule or lowered the appellant in the estimation of the society at large," he said.

On the second article, Justice Ramly noted that the appellant failed to plead exactly what the defamatory words in the article were.

"The appellant has failed to prove that the publication was the same (as what Hue had said). The law requires the very words in the libel to be set out in the statement of claim in order for the court to judge whether they constitute a ground for action.

"We uphold the decision made by the Court of Appeal and dismiss the appeal," he said.

Sitting with Justice Ramly were Federal Court judges Azahar Mohamed, Balia Yusof Wahi, Rohana Yusof and Mohd Zawawi Mohd Salleh.

The bench also ordered RAGM to pay RM60,000 in costs to Hue.

Hue was represented by Gurdial Singh Nijhar, Jessica Ram Binwani, Thaivanai Amarthaling and Ramitra Ramarao, while Ellaime Alexander appeared for RAGM.

The company had filed the suit against Hue in 2013, but lost the case at the High Court and the Court of Appeal.

RAGM also filed a suit against Malaysiakini (over the first article and video) which it lost at the High Court but the appeal was allowed at the Court of Appeal. The news portal was granted leave to appeal to the Federal Court. 

With regard to the suit against Malaysiakini, Justice Ramly said he agreed with Hue's lawyers that the words pleaded in the statement of claim against the news portal were different from those pleaded in this case.

Gurdial welcomed the decision, saying the apex court allowed people to voice the concerns of the larger community.

"We applaud the decision as it took into account the wider interest of the society," he said.

Hue was among several activists who were campaigning against the firm's gold mine in Bukit Koman, Pahang, which purportedly used cyanide as part of the gold extraction process. 

Share this story

Comments

By posting a comment, you agree to our Terms & Conditions as stipulated in full here

TERMS & CONDITIONS

Foul language, profanity, vulgarity, slanderous, personal attack, threatening, sexually-orientated comments or the use of any method of communication that may violate any law or create needless unpleasantness will not be tolerated. Antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be suspended. Violators run the risk of also being blocked permanently.

REPORT VIOLATORS

Please use the report feature that is available below each comment to flag offending comments for our moderators to take action. Do not take matters in your own hands to avoid unpleasant and unnecessary exchanges that may result in your own suspension or ban.