Perdana Menteri Dr Mahathir Mohamad semalam mengumumkan keputusan kabinet untuk menarik balik penyertaan ke dalam perjanjian Statut Rome Mahkamah Jenayah Antarabangsa (ICC) yang telah dimeterai Malaysia.
Menurut Dr Mahathir ini berpunca daripada kekelirruan yang dicipta oleh orang tertentu "yang ingin bebas memukul orang dan melakukan perkara seperti itu" .
Menegaskan penarikan itu dibuat bukan kerana perjanjian tersebut membahayakan negara, Mahathir mendakwa terdapat percubaan untuk melibatkan raja-raja menentang kerajaa serta untuk memburuk-burukkan kerajaan PH dan diri beliau sendiri selaku perdana menteri, menggunakan isu Statut Rome dengan mendakwa kerajaan telah menyerahkan semua kuasa kepada pihak asing.
Transkrip penuh dari sidang akhbar di mana Mahathir menghabiskan lebih daripada 20 minit menjelaskan kepada pemberita mengenai keputusan kabinet diterbitkan semula dalam bentuk asalnya di bawah:
Mahathir: Sekarang ini ada pihak-pihak yang berkata bahawa kalau kita terima Statute of Rome, maka kes-kes yang berlaku di Malaysia, yang bertentangan dengan so called rights of men, can lead to our being charged for non-observing human rights, dan banyak lagi.
But actually what they are saying is that if we sign this Statute of Rome, we will lose our independence. Our independence to form kita punya own policies, dasar-dasar kita, dan kita punya undang-undang di negara.
Ini tidak benar. Yang benar ialah kalau kita keterlaluan membuat sesuatu yang dianggap amat buruk sekali, barulah Statute of Rome will be applied to us. If we sign.
But even if we don’t sign, if we do things that are excessive, the whole world will still turn against us.
Saya dapati umpamanya Myanmar, Myanmar tidak sign Statute of Rome, tetapi kerana perbuatan dia yang begitu keterlaluan, excessive, maka dunia ambil pandangan yang berat terhadap Myanmar.
Dan United Nations juga memberi pandangan yang serius kepada Myanmar, tanpa apa-apa pengakuan berkenaan dengan Statute of Rome.
Jadi Statute of Rome ini hanya terkena pada kita kalau kita excessive.
Excessive bermakna katalah discrimination in favour of the Malays, carried out by seizing all properties of the Chinese and killing the Chinese. That would be excessive.
But what we are doing now is not excessive, because it is meant to ensure that everyone has a share in the wealth of this country.
To distribute wealth in order that everybody benefits from the distribution or from the opportunities in this country.
That is the purpose.
It is not about seizing properties of the Chinese, or Indians, or whatever, and then bunuh semua orang. Itu excessive. That will invite the world, the UN to condemn us.
But even if we don’t sign, they would still condemn us.
But the rumour passed around is that if we sign the treaty, the Statute of Rome ini, kalau kita tak tarik balik ratification kita, maka negara kita ini tidak boleh ada sebarang undang-undang yang boleh dianggap sebagai discriminating.
Umpamanya kalau di Eropah, mereka percaya bahawa LGBT is okay. But with us it is not okay.
But if we drag all these people and shoot them, or put them in jail, then of course it is excessive.
But if we say you will be charged in a court of law, and the court will decide, that is not excessive.
And besides that, the Statute of Rome says that if we are unwilling or unable.
Masa tu kita tau berlaku satu perkara yang dahsyat dan kita tak ambil tindakan, kerana kita unwilling ataupun kita unable.
Pada masa itu, maka kalau kita accede to the Statute of Rome, they will take action against us because we are not doing something.
But what is it that we are not doing?
We are doing for all cases of crime in Malaysia, everybody is equal before the law.
And we are going to rule this country according to the law, and the law is the law in this country, not the law in other countries.
In other countries, they may decide that it’s okay to smoke marijuana. But not here.
You do that here you will be arrested, tried according to the law, and the UN won’t have any rights to take action against us.
But on the other, hand even if you don’t sign the Statute of Rome, if you do something excessive like you prevent people from being gay and all that by collecting all of them, and lining them before the wall and then shooting them, that would be excessive.
But if they are only taken in because they break the laws of this country, not the laws of the UN, but the laws of this country, then the UN Statute of Rome does not come into play and action will be taken against us.
So, it is whether we are willing and able to implement the laws regarding excessiveness, then I think the Statute of Rome would apply.
But when we... kalau kita excessive, samada kita sign tak sign pun, the whole world will condemn us. That is the situation.
I am very surprised as some people who try to make use of this signing of the Statute of Rome as evidence that this government has surrendered everything to the Statute of Rome.
I know that there is an attempt to try and undermine this government by saying that we have now surrendered all power to foreigners.
There is no way that they can take action against us.
If for example, the previous government
Bossku curi duit, and we take action according to the law, there is no way they can interfere.
But during that time, when this country was being sold to outsiders, these people who talk about Statute of Rome, did not say anything.
Did not say anything and yet the country was being soldd to foreigners.
Even when we produced petition to the Raja-raja, signed by one million people, there was no result.
But now on this issue mereka nak cuba gunakan untuk memburukkan kerajaan terutama saya, konon pengkhianat kepada bangsa saya.
Takpa la kalau nak panggil pengkhianat boleh la, tapi mereka lebih pengkhianat daripada saya.
Pasal masa Najib curi duit, Najib jual tanah, macam-macam dia buat, mereka tak satu patah pun tegur.
They were hiding I don't know where, but they were worried that action may be taken against them.
But now that we want to have a rule of law, and we won’t take action against them, they bring up this matter.
This is a political issue, not a question about the law. It is about political issue.
Trying to blacken the name of this government including myself, and I know why, because I have been very strict about money laundering and things like that.
And if we find whoever breaches the law we don’t care who they are, we will take action, whether they are prince or pauper, we will take action. That is our stand.
But they have been able to create confusion in the minds of the people that this law negates the rights of the Malays and the rights of the Rulers and all that. It is absolute nonsense.
They can’t possibly come and depose our King because somebody under him, some soldier, might have shot somebody.
That cannot be done, because the King is not an executive, the King is not an executive king or monarch, but acts on the advice of the prime minister.
Of course, they can come to take action against me, but for what?
Am I going to kill people? Am I going to take away the privileges of the Malays?
I was the one who helped them, the Malays more than anyone else until I was known as ultra Malay. But now they are trying to damage that image because they can't make any progress politically.
Also some believe that if we don't sign the Statute of Rome, then kita boleh curi, then kita boleh buat macam-macam, tak boleh ada tindakan.
But this government will take action against those people.
Whether we accede to the Statute of Rome or not, if you break the law, we don't care who you are, we will take action against you.
If you sell land in this country to others because you are looking for money, then we will take action against you.
But, having said all that against the Statute of Rome, we understand that this is a political move.
A political move to get the Rulers to back them up.
Of course, some members of the royal family also may be involved, but the whole idea is to get the royalty in Malaysia to go against this government. That is the motive.
But because of this confusion, and the confusion also among the Rulers, we have made a decision that we will not recognise the Statute of Rome. We have ratified it, but we still have time to withdraw, and we will withdraw.
Not because the Statute of Rome is harmful to us, but because of the political confusion raised by some people, including some people who have some political ambition. We know this.
Jadi kita punya keputusan kabinet this morning is that we will withdraw our ratification of the Statute of Rome kerana confusion, bukan kerana we believe it is going to be bad for us but because of the confusion created by one particular person who wants to be free to beat up people and things like that.
And if he beats up people again, I will send the police to arrest him, I don't care who he is.
That is the move that is being taken in order to blacken the good name of this government.
So, while we will withdraw our ratification of the Statute of Rome, it is not because
we think it is harmful to our country, but it is because of the politics of this country where sometimes people are easily misled by resulted emotional feelings, that what we are doing is against our own interest.
So that is the true reason I have to explain to you.
And I would like to say this of these cowards, who during the last regime saw Najib stealing money, doing all kinds of things, and they said nothing.
There were a lot of cowards who want to benefit from Najib's misrule so that they also can benefit.
I am saying this directly at them. Who they are, you can guess. But that is the reason why they were silent then, but sekarang ni wah bukan main lagi jaguh nak pertahankan hak orang Melayu, kononnya.
Okay any other question you may have?
Soalan: You said this a Cabinet decision, but you sound very angry and upset that this decision has to be made. Why are you very upset?
Mahathir: Because I see this as a way to blacken my face because they know that they cannot oust me very easily.
So they have to paint a black picture of me. This is like old times, you know when I was called mahazalim, maha this maha that, but now they accept me as their leader. Because in politics that happens.
But I find that this particular attempt to get the rulers involved so that they can get leverage, and even trying to get the rulers to sign something order against me.
For that, I think I will have to tell them in their faces, through you of course, that they are not going to do it.
It's not because we are afraid of them, but because they make use of this politics on people who are ignorant.
Soalan: The way you describe this person that is against the signing of the Rome Statute, is this a certain prince from a southern state?
Mahathir: You can make your guess, you are welcome.
Soalan: Why did the Cabinet not seek approval from Parliament first before signing to ratify the Statute of Rome? Wouldn't it be good, then you can avoid all this?
Mahathir: No, the thing is that, we see no harm in this. It is a normal thing, and we are not going to be excessive in the exercise of power of the government.
We are not going to beat people, we are not going to jail people for no reason like the previous government.
We are not going to massacre people. So it was harmless to ask.
And in future also they will be prevented from doing this thing because we have signed this statute.
But on the other hand, believe me, if you do something wrong the whole world will jump on your back.
Soalan: Tun, bodeh dikatakan agak terlalu cepat dan mudah kabinet menukar keputusan. Kenapa dalam masa saya rasa dalam tiga minggu, tekanan tak berapa sangat Tun?
Mahathir: Kita dapat makluman tentang usaha ini, usaha untuk libatkan Raja-raja supaya menentang kerajaan, khususnya menentang perdana menteri.
Sebab itu kita perlu jelaskan usaha ini kerana saya dapati ramai yang tak faham isu ini. Mereka tak faham apa ianya Statute of Rome.
We cannot go to war. Are we going to war? Are we going to commit genocide? Are we taking away human rights?
I am not seeing anything being done here.
The previous government yes, arrested people under fictitious law, and then find there is no case, then because they lost we are able to brush aside their decision.
Soalan: Tun, so we see similar things happening back when the government was trying to ratify Icerd. How can we ensure certain parties will not create misunderstandings about international laws so that if the government decided to ratify another international convention or law, this does not happen again?
Mahathir: We must study what the law is all about, what does it subject us to, and if we find that this agreement will not do us any harm, we do not have to go around telling everybody.
The government has dthe authority to approve and to sign treaties, that is our rights.
I don't think we have to debate everything in public because we debate in public, there will be differences in opinion versus our opinion, and we cannot make a decision.
Soalan: Is this a collective decision by the cabinet?
Mahathir: Yes, that is the cabinet decision
Question: Does it mean the International Court of Law cannot hold us accountable when we do something like ethnic cleansing?
Mahathir: Ethnic cleansing, you think we are going to do ethnic cleansing?
You see what's happening to the Rohingya. The blatant massacre of people in Rohingya, pushing them out to sea, killing them through drowning, hundreds of thousands of them.
Well, the world has condemned, but the world has not done anything. The rohingyas are still afraid to go back.
So if it happens in our country, I don't think the world will do very much. I don't think they will send an army to subjugate us, to place us like a colony before.
It won't happen. But, the fact is that, if there is no such threat, rulers, members of the government of this country might abuse the law, might be excessive, like the previous government.
But as you know the previous government, when it was excessive, beyond reporting all over the world, what did it do? Nothing.
We had to overthrow the government through the election. I have made a petition to the rulers, one million people signed that petition, but nothing happened.
And the foreigners do not say anything about that, in fact, they were quite happy to receive Najib and play golf with him.
Soalan: Tun, apakah kesan daripada keputusan kabinet kepada kerajaan dan negara?
Dan kedua, pada masa depan adakah kemungkinan untuk kerajaan meleiti semula keputusan ini setelah beri penjelasan dan rakyat boleh faham, dan institutsi Raja pun faham, adakah keputusan ini akan dikaji semula?
Mahathir: Ya saya fikir boleh kerana kita tak akan teruskan dengan statute ini, maka isu ini tidak boleh dipermainkan dalam politik, dan Raja-raja yang percaya kepada penjelasan oleh pihak lain ini akan berasa senang kerana dianya takkan dilaksanakan.
Sebaliknya, saya ingin jelas berkali-kali bahawa statute ini takkan menidakkan hak kita untuk menentukan dasar kita, amalan kita, undang-undang kita, the rule of law in this country.
They cannot stop us from having our own ideas.
Yes in the west, of course, they think that LGBT is great, but in this country, it is not great
But if you are like that, don't come and flaunts all over the country saying I am a member of LGBT, you see.
But you do that, you offend people, then we have to take action against them.