It is true that we often fall into the trap of thinking that great ulama (Muslim scholars) were ulama of the past. However, the blame lies as much with the present crop of ulama in Malaysia as well.

Todays ulama are divided according to the lines of their political patronage rather than their knowledge which characterised the ulama of the past. They also have the top-down approach to Islam. To most of them, Islam can only be implemented from a position of power and nothing else, as if power is the solution to everything. This could and well be the impact of many diverse ideas within the Muslim world in general. The rise in power of ulama in Iran is an example, the consequence of which is still uncertain.

When will our ulama deal with issues that involve the economy? Or the issue of human rights in a more detailed manner than just mouthing that Islam guarantees the right of every minority in the country? Or the more practical details in implementing Islam in a non-Muslim environment? And even issues of education vis-a-vis the secular system?

Even the problem of spirituality has not been dealt with by our ulama as most of them are from the Wahabbi-indoctrinated schools which shun spirituality in Islam apart from the prayers. Politically inclined ulama are not even sure of the system they would use for gaining power. Have they made it clear what system and how politics will be like under their rule?

It is not hard to get the answer to that question as a definite no .

I think in order for them to earn our respect, they have to provide viable solutions to todays world and not just propagate to the people that by having them in power, everything will be fine. They have to go back and rethink and educate the masses on these and other issues and not just shout slogans.

More letters on same topic: Muslim dilemma: how not to get caught in a time-warp

Make room for responsible speech and modern ulama

Lessons from ulama past