Why seek out traditional medicine?
LETTER | The Health Ministry had on Jan 11 issued a statement in response to comments raised publicly by a concerned medical practitioner on the issue of traditional Chinese medicine. As a practitioner in Chinese medicine in Malaysia, I feel it is my responsibility to create greater awareness amongst the public on Chinese medicine following the statement from the government.
For the last 30 years or more, practitioners in Chinese medicine in Malaysia have gone through the academic process and qualifications offered by universities in China on Chinese medicine leading to them earning a Bachelor's degree in Chinese medicine. For those who can't afford the fees and costs to undertake a full five-year course in China, there are twinning programmes where these students do their initial four years study at a local institute with the last year in the university in China.
Universities in China now offer courses in Chinese medicine from Bachelor's courses right up to PhDs. Locally, our universities such as IMU, Inti International University & Colleges and Utar are offering Bachelor's courses in Chinese medicine too. Courses in Chinese medicine are now all evidence-based with substantial literature and research undertook to substantiate the literature. Universities in China also undertake clinical trials on the medicine before introducing it to the market.
The term 'Traditional Chinese medicine' is a misnomer in today's age. Probably it comes from the earlier days when practitioners underwent practical understudy from experienced practitioners who did the same and this term has since stuck despite the advances made in the study of Chinese medicine.
Times have changed since the opening up of China and practitioners who practice Chinese medicine in China and Malaysia are all duly qualified with a minimum Bachelor's degree in Chinese medicine. In fact, based on the requirements from our own MQA standards, the lecturers in the local universities that conduct Bachelor's courses in Chinese medicine are all PhD holders in Chinese medicine.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved acupuncture needles for treatment in 1996 with established guidelines and regulations for education and practice. There were clinical studies being undertaken where evidence from these studies support the use of acupuncture in the setting of chronic and acute or sudden pain. As a matter of fact, I won't be surprised that registered medical practitioners themselves do seek out acupuncture treatment as a remedy for their complaints.
As to Chinese practitioners making outrageous claims and charging astronomical fees, it doesn't just happen in this particular sector. In every industry and in every type of job, there are bound to be some black sheep who act outside the norm and to generalise about all because of the acts of a few is unfair and uncalled for.
Instead, questions should be asked as to why patients seek out these practitioners despite the high fees they charge. These practitioners did not coerce or force these patients to seek them out. Were the patients desperate and why did they turn desperate? I believe in the majority of the cases, patients sought out these practitioners when all else failed i.e they have consulted and been treated by registered medical practitioners and their condition did not improve or continued to deteriorate.
Under such circumstances, any normal person would have sought out whatever other treatment available no matter how outrageous their claim as the only thing that is being held out for these patients is hope - even a dint of it will make an initial non-believer believe when all else fails. No patient will wait calmly for death to arrive or live with pain for the rest of their lives.
I am not surprised that when one is on the threshold of no hope and or unbearable pain for which a registered medical practitioner can no longer help, a lot of these patients will normally seek out traditional practitioners of alternative medicine.
In this instance, whose fault is this? It can’t be for lack of awareness.
The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
Now that Chinese Traditional Medicine has a thorough science-based foundation, as you have mentioned, why still call it still Chinese Traditional Medicine or even Chinese medicine? Why not just scientifically-based medicine and non scientifically based medicine? Many great seminal discoveries which form the basis of medicine today came from various countries and nations all over the world but medicine is not known by their respective race or nation. As has been said - there is no such thing as this medicine or that medicine. Good medicine is medicine that works, and bad medicine is that which does not. And scientifically based medicine is the one which works and non scientifically based medicine the one which does not.
Well said but will the powers that be listen or implement ?



Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This action cannot be undone.