Ahmad Zahid Hamidi today denied in the Kuala Lumpur High Court that he had pointed fingers at his former executive secretary Mazlina Mazlan@Ramly over the settlement of his personal credit card bills using Yayasan Akalbudi cheques in order to absolve himself.

The former deputy prime minister also denied that his testimony in court stating that he did not know Mazlina made credit card payments using the foundation's cheques was a lie.

Zahid said this when questioned by Deputy Public Prosecutor Raja Rozela Raja Toran during the defence proceedings on 47 charges against him, namely 12 for criminal breach of trust, eight for corruption and 27 for money laundering, involving tens of millions of ringgit in funds belonging to Yayasan Akalbudi.

Raja Rozela: I suggest that you did not say a single word (to deny this) to the recording officer of the MACC when the statement was recorded because you yourself had allowed Mazlina to use the Yayasan Akalbudi cheques to pay for the credit card.

Zahid: I do not agree.

The 69-year-old also disagreed with Raja Rozela's suggestion that he had the opportunity to provide an explanation to the MACC and deny his involvement in the payments for his personal credit card.

Raja Rozela: Nevermind, I suggest that whether the original cheque or image was shown to you, it did not prevent you from giving an explanation to the MACC.

Zahid: I was under duress (at the time) because the statement was taken until 10pm.

The Bagan Datuk MP also disagreed with the prosecution that his testimony in court was false because it was not the same as the statement recorded with the MACC.

Raja Rozela: This is your statement (to the MACC), so are you saying that the statement made (previously) was not true?

Zahid: Your Honour, when you are under duress and the statement is prepared, what choice do you have?

RM10m investment to Armada Holdings

Earlier during the proceedings in the morning, Zahid asserted that Yayasan Akalbudi’s decision to invest RM10 million in Armada Holdings Sdn Bhd was not recorded in the foundation's resolution due to a mistake by the company secretary.

Zahid said before the resolution on the investment was prepared, he had held discussions about it with two trustees of the foundation.

Raja Rozela: If it is true to say that the RM10 million is an investment, why is there no black and white agreement between Yayasan Akalbudi and Armada Holdings?

Zahid: No (there wasn’t), it was just verbal agreement.

The witness agreed with Raja Rozela that RM10 million was not a small amount and that the original purpose of the establishment of the foundation was to help the asnaf (zakat recipients) and the poor.

Raja Rozela: But you decided to invest RM10 million in Armada Holdings, which does not belong to the poor.

Zahid: True, Armada Holdings is not an asnaf. But it (RM10 million given to Armada Holdings) is a form of investment that will get a 'return on investment'.

The trial before Judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah continues on July 4.

- Bernama