Court instructs parties in Rosmah's appeal to file submissions

The prosecution and defence teams need to file further submissions as to whether the Court of Appeal has the jurisdiction to hear two appeals by Rosmah Mansor, to remove High Court judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan from presiding over her money laundering and tax evasion case.

The prosecution and defence teams need to file further submissions as to whether the Court of Appeal has the jurisdiction to hear two appeals by Rosmah Mansor to remove High Court judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan from presiding over her money laundering and tax evasion case.

Rosmah (above), the wife of former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak, appealed against two decisions by Zaini who had dismissed Rosmah’s first application on Dec 14, 2021, and her second on April 25 this year.

"It is in relation to whether the matter before us is appealable under Section 3 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Coja) read together with Section 51 of Coja.

"So, the court gives both parties a month to file their further written submissions on that point," said Hanipah, who sat with judges Ahmad Nasfy Yasin and Nordin Hassan.

Section 3 of Coja states that the term "decision" means judgment, sentence or order made by the High Court, but does not include any ruling made in the course of a trial or hearing of any cause or matter which does not finally dispose of the rights of the parties.

Meanwhile, deputy public prosecutor Poh Yih Tinn told reporters that the appeals will be fixed for case management on Dec 23, pending the filing of further submissions.

Lawyers Geethan Ram Vincent and Firoz Hussein Ahmad Jamaluddin, representing Rosmah, were present in court today.

In her recusal application, Rosmah, among others, stated that the reason is to avoid any possibility of Zaini being prejudiced and biased against her if he presided over the money laundering case, given that he had presided over her solar hybrid graft trial, related to rural schools in Sarawak.

Rosmah, 70, is facing 12 money laundering charges, involving RM7,097,750, and five counts of failure to declare her income to the Inland Revenue Board.

The offences were allegedly committed at Affin Bank Berhad, Bangunan Getah Asli branch, Jalan Ampang in Kuala Lumpur, between Dec 4, 2013, and June 8, 2017, and the LHDN at Kompleks Bangunan Kerajaan, Jalan Tuanku Abdul Halim, between May 1, 2014, and May 1, 2018.

Meanwhile, the money laundering and tax evasion case is set for case management on Nov 29, before Zaini.

On Sept 1, Zaini found Rosmah guilty of three charges of corruption related to the solar hybrid project worth RM1.25 billion for 369 rural schools in Sarawak and sentenced her to 10 years in prison and imposed a fine of RM970 million.

The court also ordered Rosmah to be jailed for 30 years if she fails to pay the fine. However, the High Court granted a stay of execution of the prison sentence and fine pending her appeal to the Court of Appeal.

- Bernama

Govt fails to forfeit RM80m cash, jewellery linked to 1MDB

Rosmah cites 127 grounds in solar corruption appeal

Court rejects reinstating Deepak's lawsuit against Najib, Rosmah

Nov 14 for case management of Rosmah’s appeal in solar case