GST is no cure for Malaysia's financial malaise
MP SPEAKS The proposal to impose the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a direct result of the BN-led administration's waste, extravagance and leakages.
Idris Jala, the Minister in Prime Minister's Department, has issued a statement to strongly support the implementation of the GST as a panacea to the persistent deficit and increasing debt which Malaysia suffers today.
The Association of Chinese Chambers of Commerce has also issued a statement of support on the condition that the income tax rates are concurrently lowered.
This condition will sit well with Idris, as he stated that "...if we don’t widen the tax base, there is absolutely no room to cut income taxes further".
MP SPEAKS The proposal to impose the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a direct result of the BN-led administration's waste, extravagance and leakages.
Idris Jala, the Minister in Prime Minister's Department, has issued a statement to strongly support the implementation of the GST as a panacea to the persistent deficit and increasing debt which Malaysia suffers today.
The Association of Chinese Chambers of Commerce has also issued a statement of support on the condition that the income tax rates are concurrently lowered.
This condition will sit well with Idris, as he stated that "...if we don’t widen the tax base, there is absolutely no room to cut income taxes further".
Of the rationale provided by those in support of the immediate implementation of the GST, this must be the most unacceptable one because it means that the government will be effectively reducing taxes on workers who earn enough to pay tax today, while correspondingly increasing the taxes paid by those who don't earn enough to pay taxes.
Under such policies, the poor would be hit by a double whammy in tax burden. Firstly, the poorer income groups be forced to bear the burden of the reduced income tax of the higher income groups. On top of that, they will be hit by a regressive tax regime which taxes the poor proportionately more than the rich.
For example a person who earns RM1,000 will be spending practically the full amount of his monthly earnings without any savings. This expenditure will be taxed at an assumed 5 percent GST.
A person earning RM20,000 per month may spend RM12,000 of his income while saving or investing the balance. He will pay 5 percent on his RM12,000 expenditure, which works out to RM600.
Based on this sum, the wealthier person is effectively paying only 3 percent tax on his income. Hence the natural impact of the GST is proportionately higher on the poor than on the rich.
This is diametrically opposite to the current progressive income tax structure which raises the percentage of taxes payable at higher income brackets.
Hence if the government were to impose the GST as an excuse to lower income tax rates, then it is effectively abdicating from its obligations and role of social justice and wealth redistribution.
Instead, the GST and reduced income tax rate will only worsen the already worrisome income inequality in the country.
Cut extravagance instead
Instead of Idris arguing that "we need to broaden the tax base" because only approximately 15 percent of the working population pays taxes today, the government should be asking why the remaining 85 percent are not earning enough to pay taxes after decades of so-called rapid growth and economic development.
We must remember that it is not because these 85 percent do not want to pay tax, but because they don't earn enough to be eligible to do so.
It should be noted that the income tax brackets have not been modified for nearly two decades and the question is why the overwhelming majority of workers are still earning suppressed wages at less than RM2,500-3,000 per month.
While we agree with Idris that there are indeed those fail to declare their true income, which results in tax evasion, surely the number of such persons are tiny relative to the 85 percent who are not eligible to pay taxes.
Why should the failure of the authorities to enforce tax on evaders justify the government's decision to tax all Malaysians who are struggling to make ends meet with income less than RM2,500?
In addition, it should be argued that decades of strong and rapid economic growth boasted by the BN administration should have enriched the government with annual surpluses and record savings.
Instead, despite the chest-thumping over the government's ability to manage the economy, we now find ourselves in persistent deficit while the federal government debt has ballooned to RM546 billion, without taking into account another RM150 billion of known contingent liabilities.
The cure for the financial malaise lies not in taxing the people more, especially taxing those who barely earn enough to meet the rising cost of living. The panacea lies in the political will to cut wastage, patronage, extravagance and corruption in government expenditure.
Due to the fact that we are fortunately blessed with oil and gas revenues, as well as an enviable economic growth record over the past decades, the government actually have enough funds in its coffers. What it has however failed to do, is to ensure that these funds are properly utlised and invested.
Until this government learns and proves to the people that it knows how to manage the rakyat's hard-earned monies in an honest, professional and efficient manner, it will have no right to raise more taxes from the people, especially from the middle-income and the poor.
TONY PUA is the DAP’s member of parliament for Petaling Jaya Utara.
Report this comment


Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This action cannot be undone.