Prof: Elections often get worse before improving
Elections in countries where its transparency is in question often need to "get worse" before it finally improves, a British professor who specialises in political ethics and electoral institutions said today.
Elections in countries where its transparency is in question often need to "get worse" before it finally improves, a British professor who specialises in political ethics and electoral institutions said today.
In an hour long lecture at the Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall, Prof Sarah Birch, from the University of Glasgow, said that people's movement leading to electoral reform comes due to the "episodic" grievances of the people.
"Normally, electoral rights are guaranteed on paper. But episodically these rights can be taken away through implementation of the election process, to increase grievances.
"This creates a huge potential for mobilisation," she said.
Birch also said that the first past the post electoral system, which Malaysia uses, is "problematic". She also singled it as the one that is most "convenient" one for an authoritarian government.
"The system invites boundary manipulation, it allows a party to retain power for a long time with the support of a minority population.
This is because politicians are only required to get to the wining threshold by shifting a few votes strategically.
She also said that based on her experience and research, authoritarian or semi-democratic governments are less likely to manipulate voting itself, in manipulating the electoral process.
"They only do it if they are really desperate - it is not the preferred general malpractice," she said.
Birch said that protests are more "likely" to lead to electoral reforms, because leaders can take heed of what has happened in other countries before them.
Report this comment


Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This action cannot be undone.