Apologise or we'll sue, lawyer Zaid and two partners tell Bar chief
Veteran lawyer Zaid Ibrahim and his two partners are demanding a full and unequivocal retraction and apology from Malaysian Bar president Karen Cheah.
Through a letter of demand issued on Aug 26, this was being sought over the Bar’s media statement regarding their alleged conduct during the Federal Court hearing of former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak’s RM42 million SRC International corruption case appeal.
Zaid (above) as well as lawyers Liew Teck Huat and Rueben Mathiavaranam claimed that the press release was...
Veteran lawyer Zaid Ibrahim and his two partners are demanding a full and unequivocal retraction and apology from Malaysian Bar president Karen Cheah.
Through a letter of demand issued on Aug 26, this was being sought over the Bar’s media statement regarding their alleged conduct during the Federal Court hearing of former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak’s RM42 million SRC International corruption case appeal.
Zaid (above) as well as lawyers Liew Teck Huat and Rueben Mathiavaranam claimed that the press release was a “grave and serious libel”, and that they would commence legal action against Cheah if there is no retraction and apology by Sept 2.
They claimed the Aug 19 media statement “falsely and maliciously” contained statements regarding their conduct during the Federal Court hearing.
The lawyers stated that the press release contained several paragraphs that showed a “reckless disregard as to whether the imputations complained of (were) true”.
They alleged the paragraphs suggested the lawyers had “deliberately acted unprofessionally”, “with an improper agenda to abuse the process of the court”, that they resorted to “unscrupulous strategies”, and that their “conduct was designed to pervert the course of justice” and “bring the legal profession into disrepute”.
The trio claimed that her statements suggested they were “unprofessional, incompetent and ignorant of the professional rules of practice and etiquette”, had “no compunction in abusing the process of the court”, had acted “in flagrant contempt of court” and were “not fit to practice as advocates and solicitors”.
They described the statements as “false and scurrilous”, adding that “by publishing and disseminating the press statement and causing the impugned statements to be published (by) online news portals, (Cheah) intended to and did ensure that it received the most extensive coverage possible… across the entire Malaysian public”.
“You further knew … that (Najib’s appeal) had attracted wide international media coverage and (that your) imputations (would be) disseminated to the international community as well,” the lawyers contended.

The legal letter also seeks for the Malaysian Bar president to give an undertaking not to repeat the statements concerning the lawyers as well as for compensation involving reasonable costs and expenses.
Malaysiakini is awaiting a response from the counsel as well as Cheah over the matter.
Alleging abuse of judicial process
On Aug 19, the Bar released a media statement condemning the conduct of Najib’s legal team during the apex court appeal hearing.
Cheah had described the lawyers’ conduct as amounting to an abuse of the country’s judicial process and had brought the system into disrepute, and the lawyers involved should face disciplinary action.
She said while Najib is entitled to discharge his lawyers and appoint new ones, doing so also means taking the risk that the court may not allow a postponement while the new legal team takes over since such postponements are not an automatic entitlement.
Cheah added that regarding Najib’s lawyers, the rules of legal practice stipulate that lawyers shall not accept any case unless they are reasonably certain of being able to appear and represent the client on the hearing dates fixed by the court.
She said the lawyers must also make every effort to be ready for trial on those dates, per Rules 6(a) and 24(a) of the Legal Profession Act (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978.
In late July, Najib discharged the team led by Muhammad Shafee Abdullah as his counsel and appointed lawyers from the firm Messrs Zaid Ibrahim Suflan TH Liew & Partners, as well as from a law firm headed by counsel Hisyam Teh Poh Teik.
Najib is currently serving a 12-year jail term, following the apex court on Tuesday last week dismissing the former finance minister’s appeal to quash his conviction and sentencing in the SRC case.
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2022/08/8583d3742eff40b8fb4712973cbca15c.jpg)

/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2022/08/95d8f101805c6c334c7d9420b05afbae.jpg)
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2022/08/559bdbb14436a7a2970ecf3a24309870.jpg)
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2022/08/d392593895a7a820468e246d83a25233.jpg)
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2022/08/751c60d3f8252f8c41bb1b5057ae33ea.jpg)
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2022/08/50daa3792ca2b4fae5bfb1cab63b0a5b.jpg)



Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This action cannot be undone.