Someone recently asked me two questions about the Attorney General which I could not answer.

The first question related to “why the Attorney General and IGP ‘interfered with’ the elections after it has been called, and insisted on changing the rules?”

Do the AG and IGP have any such authority within a jurisdiction of interim governance, on a subject which was almost under the full jurisdiction of the Elections Commission?

This too especially after the GE has been called, and the operative policy for the GE already announced?

Who has or holds the policy imperative on this indelible ink episode? Does the AG have such an “interpretive authority?”