Malaysiakini
LETTER

Workers' housing should be mandatory

Mohideen Abdul Kader

Published
Modified 30 Jul 2019, 10:21 pm

LETTER | The Consumers’ Association of Penang (CAP) is disappointed that Workers’ Minimum Standards of Housing and Amenities Act 1990 amendment Bill does not make it mandatory for employers to provide their workers with housing. 

This is a major step backwards in terms of the government dealing with the plight of foreign workers and even local workers who work far from home. Employers should provide housing for these workers, especially those who are only paid the minimum wage.

When a local wants to employ a foreign worker, it is common practice that the contract signed between the two parties will include that the employer will provide food and accommodation to the employee and that the cost for this will be borne by the employer. While this ensures that the foreign worker is not stranded often times the accommodation provided by their employers are unhealthy and dangerous.

Unlike foreign workers, local workers who have been employed by a company far from home are usually left to fend for themselves. This is also unjust as those moving to another state for work could be just as helpless as the foreign workers who travel to a different country to work.

The new bill should have alleviated this problem completely by making workers housing mandatory but it did not. Two things about the new bill should be highlighted. The first is that is has made it optional for employers to provide their employees with housing (except estate workers) and employers may collect rent or any charges related to the accommodation. The second is that workers housing must meet the minimum standards stated in the act and housing must have a Certificate of Accommodation.

Setting minimum standards and requiring certificates can be a good thing as workers will not be living in dangerous situations, such as construction workers living in containers on the worksite or having too many factory workers cramped into one low-cost flat unit.

However, not making it mandatory for employers to provide accommodation is not good as many employers may now choose not to provide accommodation for their workers, be they local or foreign. Those desperate enough will still work far from home and if they cannot afford their own housing then the number of homeless could increase. Or they use most of their salary to pay rent and end up borrowing and subsequently falling into debt. Both scenarios are bad.

We iterate that the common practice of employers providing accommodation for their foreign workers should be made mandatory for all workers, foreign or local.


The writer is acting president, CAP.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

Share this story

Comments

By posting a comment, you agree to our Terms & Conditions as stipulated in full here

TERMS & CONDITIONS

Foul language, profanity, vulgarity, slanderous, personal attack, threatening, sexually-orientated comments or the use of any method of communication that may violate any law or create needless unpleasantness will not be tolerated. Antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be suspended. Violators run the risk of also being blocked permanently.

REPORT VIOLATORS

Please use the report feature that is available below each comment to flag offending comments for our moderators to take action. Do not take matters in your own hands to avoid unpleasant and unnecessary exchanges that may result in your own suspension or ban.