Most Read
Most Commented
mk-logo
News
YOURSAY | Anwar’s failures, Umno's success

YOURSAY | ‘The litany of failures is damning.’

COMMENT | Anwar enabled Umno's comeback

EmEmKay: Commander (Rtd) of the Royal Malaysian Navy, S Thayaparan's incisive analysis hits home with a stark and uncomfortable truth: Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, the very figurehead of reform, has inadvertently paved the way for Umno’s resurgence.

The article meticulously dismantles the narrative of progress, revealing a landscape littered with unfulfilled promises and delayed reforms that have systematically eroded public trust and galvanised the very forces Anwar once vowed to dismantle.

The litany of failures is damning. The stalled Prime Minister Term Limits bill, a cornerstone of good governance, exposes a profound lack of political will.

The perpetually “delayed” separation of powers between the attorney-general and public prosecutor screams of a system desperate to retain centralised control rather than embracing true judicial independence.

The legislative quagmire surrounding the Freedom of Information and Ombudsman Acts is a cynical betrayal of the public’s right to accountability and transparency.

But the most egregious betrayal, the one that truly alienated reformist voters and, as Thayaparan correctly identifies, fuelled narratives ahead of the 16th general election, is Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi receiving a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) on his 47 graft charges related to Yayasan Akalbudi.

This single decision, compounded by subsequent manoeuvres by the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC), wasn’t just a misstep; it was a seismic shockwave that shattered the illusion of a new Malaysia.

It demonstrated a willingness to compromise fundamental principles of justice for political expediency, leaving a gaping wound in the trust of those who had placed their hopes in Anwar.

The “curbing political appointments” pledge, repeatedly reversed and riddled with exceptions, further underscores this cynical opportunism.

Thayaparan isn’t just pointing out flaws; he’s dissecting a profound failure of leadership. Anwar, once the beacon of reform, has become a compromised figure, his credibility severely strained by a series of decisions that prioritise short-term political survival over long-term institutional integrity.

The article serves as a chilling premonition: if Anwar continues down this path of reform-lite and political concessions, the “comeback” Thayaparan warns of will not just be Umno’s, but a broader regression for Malaysian democracy.

This isn’t just criticism; it’s a desperate plea for a course correction before the very soul of the reform movement is irrevocably lost.

Quigonbond: There are a lot of assumptions going on here.

I think historians will debate whether Anwar gave in to right-wing pandering (and therefore enabled Umno) without putting up a fight or whether, to him, the preservation of stability trumped all other requirements, including sacrificing his own party in state elections.

Or if he is really just a pretend reformist, or if he wanted to show the Malays he can be trusted before spending the remaining political capital on reforms that neither Umno nor PAS is interested in.

What I object to is that we have a bunch of armchair critics who kvetch endlessly, especially within the echo chambers of Malaysiakini, BFM, and other reformist social media, demoralising the reform base.

This resulted in Pakatan Harapan failing to retain its support and gaining significantly more Malay votes, as if that would improve the situation.

Maybe it is Harapan’s fault because they have become disastrously bad at the social media game; maybe their reform messaging has been watered down by the necessary political arithmetic, but reformists certainly are not helping themselves.

Yes, by all means stick to high-and-mighty purist principles. But what do you want? You want to punish Harapan, especially Anwar?

Meaning you want a Umno or PAS leader to become prime minister?

How's that helping reforms or moderation when Harapan is going to end up in the opposition?

IndigoTrout2522: I believe many would fully agree with the author.

Anwar is the main problem, sidelining DAP even with the largest number of MPs within Harapan and moving too far to appease Zahid and Umno, believing it would attract more Malay Muslim support for PKR.

His policies, funding distributions, cabinet, and political appointments reflected clearly this approach.

DAP under secretary-general Anthony Loke and deputy chairperson Nga Kor Ming went along, saying the party must make sacrifices.

In the end, non-Malays felt DAP did not stand up for them while Malays blamed DAP for everything, even though Zahid and Umno ministers effectively led the Madani government.

The political atmosphere became racially toxic. Anwar and Zahid just stayed silent, and Loke would reprimand other DAP leaders for rocking the boat.

Then, DAP’s top leadership was shocked by its defeat in three state elections.

Why was DAP surprised when there were clear signs by both supporters and leaders that it was not reflecting reality on the ground?

Anwar should consider stepping aside and not standing for re-election, and work to reconcile with its sidelined leaders like former PKR deputy president Rafizi Ramli, embark on fulfilling its promised reforms, reshuffling the cabinet without Umno, the economy and bringing to book those found to be corrupt.

Loke and Amanah president Mohamad Sabu should consider the same to empower new leaders.

This is a bold and unimaginable step, but the right strategy to bring back a positive perception that they are finally doing something for the rakyat, but time is short before the next general election.

lueShark1548: Commander, keep writing on Anwar’s mistakes, weaknesses, and chameleon character.

We need to bury this man who has turned out to be the worst prime minister in our history.

He and his daughter Nurul Izzah put out a burning light of Malay leaders leading the nation out of race and religion policies into the bright light of a Malaysia for all Malaysians with equal rights subject to our constitution.

We have lost this opportunity. Anwar has allowed the ascendancy of Umno and Perikatan Nasional. We are back to the decades of disunity and fertile grounds where corruption and cronyism thrive.

This is really sad.

The bare minimum that non-Malays could do is to reject PKR and DAP for this lost opportunity in the next general election.

BlueFish0451: Critics argue that the pursuit of political survival has come at the expense of the original reform agenda.

In their view, compromises made to maintain power have weakened the reformist spirit that once attracted broad public support.

Recent departures of prominent figures and the disengagement of younger leaders are seen by some as signs of growing disillusionment within the political landscape.

They contend that established political actors remain preoccupied with internal power struggles while the country faces increasingly serious challenges.

Unless meaningful reforms and leadership renewal take place, these critics fear the nation’s long-term prospects could deteriorate further.


The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. In the past year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now.

These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as fact.


Please join the Malaysiakini WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news and views that matter.

ADS