COMMENT | A statesperson's responsibility

COMMENT | In a recent development that has sent shockwaves through the country’s political landscape, former prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin has been charged under the Sedition Act 1948 over remarks he made during a campaign speech in the Nenggiri by-election.

The charge, which could lead to a fine of up to RM5,000 or imprisonment for up to three years, is a reflection of the gravity of his actions and the potential impact they could have on national unity and the respect for the constitutional monarchy.

This is not just a case of an ordinary citizen expressing an opinion; this is a statement made by a former prime minister, a statesperson who should exemplify the qualities of wisdom, restraint, and above all, respect for the foundational institutions of the country.

As someone who once held the highest executive office in Malaysia, Muhyiddin’s words carry significant weight. His influence extends beyond his immediate followers, reaching across the political spectrum, particularly among the Malay population, where his coalition controls a substantial number of parliamentary seats.

This influence comes with a great responsibility, one that demands careful consideration before making statements that could be perceived as questioning the integrity of the monarchy.

Serious accusation

The monarchy in Malaysia is not just a ceremonial institution. It is a symbol of unity and continuity that transcends the political divisions of the day.

The Yang di-Pertuan Agong, as the constitutional monarch, plays a crucial role in the nation’s governance, particularly in appointing the prime minister.

This power is not exercised arbitrarily but is guided by the Federal Constitution and the advice of key figures in the government and legal fraternity.

When Muhyiddin questioned why he was not appointed as prime minister despite claiming majority support, he did not merely express disappointment. He implied a lack of fairness on the part of the king, which is a serious accusation.

Such a statement, coming from someone of Muhyiddin’s stature, is not just an expression of personal grievance. It has the potential to incite his followers and the broader population against the monarchy.

Dangerously divisive

In a country where the institution of royalty is deeply respected, particularly among the Malay community, such rhetoric can be dangerously divisive.

It can erode trust in the monarchy and fuel sentiments that may lead to public unrest. The risk is not merely theoretical. It is a clear and present danger given the polarised political climate in Malaysia.

By making this statement, Muhyiddin opens the floodgates to a series of actions and reactions that could destabilise the social fabric of the nation.

His followers, many of whom hold deep respect for him as a leader, might be persuaded to view the monarchy with suspicion or even hostility.

This is particularly concerning given that many of these followers are from constituencies that have historically supported the monarchy and its role in the country’s governance.

The ripple effect of such sentiments could lead to a wider questioning of the role of the monarchy, something that could have far-reaching consequences for Malaysia’s constitutional democracy.

Not to silence dissent

The Sedition Act, though often criticised, exists to protect the sanctity of the nation’s key institutions, including the monarchy. It is not a tool for silencing dissent but a measure to ensure that public discourse does not cross the line into incitement or the promotion of discord.

In this case, the charge against Muhyiddin is a reflection of the seriousness with which the government views any attempt to undermine the monarchy.

It is a reminder that even those who have held the highest offices in the land are not above the law and that the stability and unity of the nation must be preserved at all costs.

Furthermore, Muhyiddin’s statement suggests an inability to move on from past political defeats, which is unbecoming of a statesperson.

A true leader, particularly one who has served as prime minister, should demonstrate the ability to accept the decisions of the nation’s institutions with grace, even when they do not align with personal ambitions.

By resurrecting this issue in a public forum, Muhyiddin not only undermines his own credibility but also risks dragging the nation back into a period of uncertainty and division.

The charge against Muhyiddin under the Sedition Act is not just a legal matter. It is a necessary action to safeguard the integrity of Malaysia’s constitutional monarchy and to prevent the erosion of public trust in the country’s key institutions.

His statement, given his position and influence, carries the potential to incite division and unrest, making it imperative that such rhetoric be addressed firmly and decisively. As Malaysians, we must uphold the principles of respect and unity that are enshrined in our Rukun Negara, and ensure that our leaders, past and present, do the same.

RAZIZ RASHID is strategic communications consultant and chairperson for Pertubuhan Sukarelawan Siber Selamat (CyberSafe).

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

Bersatu rep recalls Karpal sedition case in stroll down memory lane

Putrajaya not behind sedition charge against Muhyiddin, says Fahmi

Muhyiddin's sedition charge: Hamzah says truth will prevail

LFL slams 'dictatorial' sedition charge against Muhyiddin

'Emulate Najib', multiple strikes Muhyiddin told to quit

Muhyiddin claims trial to sedition charge