COMMENT | Anwar's Umno state of mind

COMMENT | The unfolding judicial crisis, as top judges retire, leaving a lacuna within the service and the very independence of the judiciary threatened, is Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s doing.

He founded “reformasi” 27 years ago. His name pushed PKR and Pakatan Harapan to prominence after the 2018 general election.

But events have shown that Anwar has not evolved enough to shed his Umno snakeskin and look to the future of the nation instead of narrow self-interest.

What he will end up with, sadly, is the loss of his own power and influence at the polls with the continued resurgence of PAS, which will push him out of relevance in the political future of the country.

He will be consigned to the sidelines of history - a person who had the opportunity but did nothing to further the cause of “reformasi”.

Soliciting judicial compliance

With power dependent on a tainted Umno and a political alliance whose future is increasingly reliant on a close, abiding relationship with that party to secure votes, however feeble that argument may be, Anwar is actively soliciting judicial compliance on his less-than-reverential path to hold on to power and achieve his goals.

That is something that every prime minister since independence has done, every single one of them previously a high-ranking Umno official, none of them allowing the judiciary to play its full role as a guardian and instrument of the constitution and a fearless upholder of justice for all.

Instead, Umno has consistently perverted the role of the judiciary to be subservient to the legislature and especially the executive, consistently using pliant judges to undermine their own and using them as instruments to serve pure, unadulterated political aims, many of them bad for the people and the nation.

The culmination of this was seen in 1988, when one of the worst of Umno PMs, Dr Mahathir Mohamad, a strong believer that the judiciary must serve the executive and the legislature, wielded all the power he had and more to decimate the judiciary, taking action against the head of the judiciary and five senior judges.

With control over the judiciary and compliant head judges, he went on a rampage, pushing everything through with no proper judicial oversight, including the trumped-up charges of sodomy and abuse of power under which Anwar suffered, first under Mahathir and then under Najib Abdul Razak.

A reputation revived

One would have thought that, having been a victim of oppression before, Anwar would be much more amenable to an independent judiciary and to fulfil campaign promises made a long time ago to restore judicial independence.

The irony of it was that with the push from Harapan partners after the 2018 election, which saw Najib ousted as PM, even with Mahathir at the helm, judicial reform started in earnest, first with the appointment on July 11 that year of Richard Malanjum as chief justice.

On his retirement in April 2019, the current CJ Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat was appointed on May 2, 2019 and led the judiciary to a revival of its reputation, severely tarnished in the aftermath of the 1988 crackdown.

She is due to retire today and, strangely, did not receive the customary six-month extension given to senior judges on the expiry of their terms.

Two other senior judges face a similar fate - Court of Appeal president Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim and senior Federal Court judge Nallini Pathmanathan.

Malaysiakini reported Tengku Maimun will reach the mandatory retirement age for judges, 66, tomorrow, July 2, with Abang Iskandar hitting the milestone the very next day. Nallini’s 66th birthday will be on Aug 23.

All Anwar had to do was extend their tenure, and then he has six months to figure out who would take their places if he has not already.

That gives time for a smooth transition. But he does not want to miss the opportunity to put his people in key judicial positions.

Yes, technically, the Judicial Appointments Commission recommends the appointments, but as Anwar appoints five of the nine to the commission, he controls.

Much like Donald Trump in the US, he is using his position to put people he can influence into the ranks of the judiciary, caring little for an independent judiciary and its role.

A hollow pushback

Anwar’s pushback against those who are supposedly lobbying for Tengku Maimun and others rings hollow - you should not jettison a legitimate extension of competent persons simply because others are lobbying for them. The decision must be made on merit.

The timing could not have been worse for Anwar, who is facing a contentious civil suit for sexual assault he wanted immunity from and yet another discharge not amounting to acquittal for Najib due to the fault of the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC), which could not produce relevant documents.

Anwar’s accuser in the civil case is a former aide, Yusoff Rawther, who had filed a civil case against Anwar.

However, Anwar filed an application to stay the trial proceedings, seeking to refer constitutional questions to the Federal Court regarding the immunity of the Prime Minister’s Office from civil suits.

The High Court initially dismissed Anwar’s bid to refer these questions. But on June 10, the Court of Appeal granted Anwar a temporary (ad interim) stay of the civil trial, pending his appeal over the constitutional questions. The hearing for the full stay application has been fixed for July 21.

Separately, Yusoff himself was acquitted on June 12 of drug trafficking and imitation firearm possession charges that were filed against him after a police raid on his car in September 2024.

During this trial, Yusoff, who was detained from his arrest until he was acquitted, claimed he was a victim of entrapment by people in power. Details of the civil suit published on social media have damaging information on Anwar if true.

Criticisms of the entire episode centre around what could amount to trumped-up charges against Yusoff and his detention, and Anwar’s move to obtain immunity because of his position.

The right thing to do is to give Yusoff his day in court and dispute his allegations legally. The system seems to have discriminated heavily against Yusoff, made worse by the charges he was acquitted of later.

That raises reasonable yet unanswered suspicions.

Anwar will pay at the polls

Anwar’s recent railing in defence of the highly criticised latest discharge not amounting to acquittal (DNAA) of Najib again is misfounded.

No one is asking him to interfere with the judiciary, but when DNAAs are the result of the incompetence and oversight of the AGC, they are wrong.

Anwar, as PM, appoints the attorney-general. If the AG is not doing his job properly, Anwar as PM must do something about it. Najib dismissed his AG for the wrong reasons; Anwar can do it for the right reasons.

As things remain, most of the nation thinks that the DNAAs are designed to help free Najib in a deal which Anwar may have made with Umno, whose top officials are the ones crying out the loudest for Najib’s freedom.

There are too many questions unanswered, and the very lack of answers is a clear indication that Anwar has not shed his Umno mould. Like many politicians around the world, he is seeking a compliant judiciary to further his political goals.

That’s tragic considering the major strides the judiciary has made since the momentous 2018 election to restore its independence, integrity and competence.

History will blame Anwar, but he will pay for it earlier - at the next polls - as public confidence in him wanes.

Malaysians are not easily fooled, as the descent of Najib and other Umno wallahs shows. But even in defeat, delusion still prevails until the very end - Anwar is hitched to the wrong caravan, Umno, the one steadily gaining speed on a downhill path to destruction.

Related articles

Bar to hold EGM over judicial vacancies as CJ's term ends

On CJ's final day, DAP backs extension amid silence from Putrajaya

KINIGUIDE | On the appointment of judges and how PM has a role

COMMENT | Call for judges' tenure extension nothing to do with lobby

COMMENT | Anwar's Umno state of mind

COMMENT | Danger signs of public confidence erosion in our systems

YOURSAY | PM chooses key people in govt, not the royals

P GUNASEGARAM says most of the world’s problems are caused by bad politicians who refuse to harness the power and potential of the right people for good.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

Set up RCI to probe whether Yusoff was framed - Muhyiddin

COMMENT | Anwar vs Yusoff - who wins narrative battle?

Not extending CJ's term only deepens concerns for judiciary: Rafizi to PM

Bar: Govt inaction on CJ's tenure a failure in institutional responsibility

Ramkarpal joins chorus urging govt to retain Tengku Maimun as CJ

'Echoes of 1988': PSM slams Anwar, Harapan over CJ's tenure

As CJ retirement looms, Fadhli contrasts Tengku Maimun and Azam

Renewed calls for AGC reform amid public anger over political DNAA cases