I agree with the comments that the beliefs of leaders should not be imposed on the citizens. Many have put forward this argument as the basis of their disagreement with PAS' plans to create an Islamic state in Malaysia.

Allow me to propose a slightly different perspective on this matter.

It is for the very reason that the leaders' beliefs should not be imposed on the citizens that I actually support PAS' efforts. PAS is proposing two different systems for Muslims and non-Muslims. Whereas those who oppose PAS' efforts want to have only one system for both Muslims and non-Muslims. In other words, PAS gives me choice and does not force their ideologies upon me. But those who are opposing PAS' efforts are trying to impose their beliefs on everyone else.

The non-Muslims have made a choice and Muslims have also made a choice. The former chose not to follow shariah while the latter chose to abide by the shariah rules. No Muslims would deny that it is an obligation for them to follow Islamic law unless they have something to fear or something to lose.

By wanting to stay as Muslims, they have made their choice. Thus, only PAS' way would allow this choice to be exercised in its totality - even covering the choice of criminal law. Where else can you find a system that promotes freedom and choice such as this? Where else can you find a system which allow people of different groups to choose which criminal justice system to follow.

Perhaps those opposing PAS' Islamic state should realise that they are actually doing exactly what they say PAS should not do! What an irony...