Sheriff Nazri and his cowboy law
"Are we going to read some news tomorrow, saying a Pakatan Rakyat politician was shot and killed by some MACC staff because he was ‘trying to attack' the staff...".
On Nazri: Use your guns if needed
Hann Wei Toh : Are we going to read some news tomorrow, saying a Pakatan Rakyat politician was shot and killed by some MACC staff because the politician was ‘trying to attack' the staff in order to cover up a corrupt act?
Hardtail : H1N1 is also a threat to the nation. Should the health minister also give government doctors and Rela officers the order to shoot people with runny nose and cough?
Jefferson76: At this rate, Teoh Beng Hock won't be the last death connected with this agency. Maybe this is the easier way to take over the Selangor government.
Tan Kian Khim : I can't help but laugh with grim satisfaction: 10 out of 10 comments before mine do not believe the arson attack was real. That is how low MACC has sunk in the public's eye.
For the record, I think MACC burnt their own vehicle too - just like they fabricated the previous 'death threat' to the MACC chief. No difficulty at all in staging the incident, considering their experience. MACC is so desperate to squirm out of its predicament now that it will try anything.
Vote For A Change : Though it is unfair to make assumptions, my trust in MACC is so low I have to agree with that it is possible that MACC may have torched its own vehicle. MACC is now under intense pressure and what better way to create a diversion than to do something like this to earn some sympathy...
On A blatant lie, says former law partner
P Dev Anand Pillai : If the RM220,000 was deposited into the firm's clients' account, and then the authorised signatory uses that money for any other purpose besides that for what the client has instructed, it will be tantamount to a breach of trust which is a criminal offence.
It is something every advocate and solicitor must avoid if they would want to practice with honour, conscience and integrity in the profession. This candidate should quit when he can before he is annihilated on election day.
Ong: I hope Rohaizat Othman decides not to withdraw so that the by-election results can be used as an excellent and useful gauge to determine the percentage of Malaysians who will give their votes to a known crook.
Umno members have shown many times in the past right up till their recent party elections that they are ever willing to elect known and proven crooks as their leaders. We will find out from the Permatang Pasir by-election results if Malaysians in general are like Umno members.
Jerry Tan : Yusri Isahak should sue for defamation as they had earlier said he was the real culprit.
On Muhyiddin denies selling land to Singapore
Eric : This is a serious allegation by our DPM. Maybe Lee Kuan Yew can come out to clarify this.
Wong Chee Kong : Wow! This is the first time we hear Singapore wanted to go to war. How come nobody said anything about this at that time? Must be classified information held under the OSA (Official Secrets Act)? If so, has the man breached the OSA? This is serious, you know?
Rocky : Go to war? Another attempt to divert from issues in the country and focus on Singapore?
On Sultan shoots down Khalid's zakat proposal
Sjmc : I have to agree with the sultan here. Let zakat be retained for its original purpose which is to help poor Muslims. We can certainly tap other sources if the state budget is short of funds.
Ghkok : The article fails to say that Khalid made that proposal because BN is withholding funds from the state government. BN is channeling funds through their own channel in the state.
This is against democracy and the will of the people who have voted in Pakatan as the rightful state government who shall handle the use and disbursement of funds meant for the state.
Chee Hoe Siew : Based on the article, I would agree with the sultan that zakat should not be used for state development. If it has all along been used for helping the poor, it should continue to be used for this purpose.
Selangorian : There appears to be some misunderstanding of MB's proposal . In the last Dewan Negeri Selangor meeting, he proposed establishing Baitulmal for Development under the zakat system, not using zakat fund for development.
Those in the state would know he and the sultan has never been at odds. It's doubtful that sultan was actually referring to MB's proposal.


Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This action cannot be undone.