Court dismisses petition for Kuala Berang and Hulu Besut
The Election Court in Kuala Terengganu has rejected with costs the petitions by PAS to declare the 13th general election (GE13) results for the Kuala Berang and Hulu Besut state seats won by the Barisan Nasional (BN) as null and void.
The Election Court in Kuala Terengganu has rejected with costs the petitions by PAS to declare the 13th general election (GE13) results for the Kuala Berang and Hulu Besut state seats won by the Barisan Nasional (BN) as null and void.
Judge Mariana Yahya rejected the petitions on grounds that the petitioners failed to comply with Regulation 9 of the Election Petition Rules 1954.
The judge ordered the petitioner for Kuala Berang result to pay RM50,000 to Kuala Berang assemblyperson Tengku Putera Tengku Awang and RM50,000 each to the returning officer and the Election Commission.
She also ordered the petitioner for the Hulu Besut result to pay RM50,000 to Hulu Besut assemblyperson Nawi Mohamad.
Tengku Putera beat PAS’ Muhyidin Abdul Rashid in Kuala Berang with a 449-vote majority while Nawi defeated PAS’ Shalahhudin Jaafar in Hulu Besut with a 1,570-vote majority.
Meanwhile, the Election Court in Ipoh has struck out with costs a petition by the former PAS candidate to declare the 13th general election (GE13) results for the Rungkup state seat won by the BN as null and void.
Judge Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid rejected the petition on grounds that personal lawyer Chan Kok Keong, who represented petitioner Misbahul Munir Masduki, only filed a notice of acceptance of the appointment in court yesterday.
This is against Regulation 34 of the Election Petition Rules 1954 which requires the counsel to file the notice as soon as he was appointed.
For this, the judge ordered the petitioner to pay RM5,000 each to Rungkup assemblypersons Shahrul Zaman Yahya and the EC.
Umi Kalthum said although the petitioner hired a personal lawyer, the petition was filed through Messrs Chan & Associates on June 13.
‘Only the petitioner or his lawyer can file the petition’
This is against Regulation 9 of the Election Rules 1954 which requires the name of the counsel representing the petitioner to be attached to the petition and only the petitioner or his lawyer could file the petition and not a law firm.
Umi Kalthum said the court found that the Malay version of the petition documents filed in the court on that date was signed by lawyer Chan Kok Keong to which it was confirmed by him during the proceedings today.
The is a very serious matter as it involved authority as Misbahul Munir as the petitioner has the authority to sign the documents, but he did not do so, she added.
She said however, the English version of the petition documents, which were used as a reference by the petitioner and the respondents, were not filed in court.
Umi Kalthum also ordered Misbahul Munir to pay RM30,000 each in costs to Shahrul Zaman and the EC.
Moments later, Misbahul Munir, who was seated in the public gallery, stood up and asked the court to use its discretion not to impose any costs on him or to reduce them.
Umi Kalthum, however, said the costs were arrived at after taking into account various aspects of the law and were not restricted to the election petition alone.
“An election petition is a serious matter. You have the right to take (legal) action, but you also have to take the risk. This is a serious legal action,” she said, adding that the costs imposed were reasonable after considering the time and energy spent by the respondents to prepare for the
proceedings.
- Bernama


Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This action cannot be undone.