YOURSAY ‘Sin tax should be used judiciously without racial or religious slant.’

DAP: Use gambling tax for non-Malay purposes         

Awakened: We have clear segregation between Islamic banking and normal banking, halal and non-halal food, halal and non-halal businesses.

It is high time to segregate non-halal tax from halal tax. The non-halal taxes should be used for the maintenance and building of vernacular schools, temples and churches and for the welfare of non-Muslims.

If it is impractical to segregate these taxes, I suggest the government to ban all the gaming businesses so that no non-halal taxes will be used by Muslims.

Onyourtoes: I know this suggestion is probably to spite those “holier than thou” people, but we have to be a little more careful in what we are suggesting.

How many ways do you want to dissect this country further? Are you saying non-Malays should depend on gambling and other sinful activities to finance social, educational and welfare services?

Why can’t non-Malays get their fair share of revenue from the national coffers (which they also contribute to) just like anyone else?

It is an oxymoron for me to promote immoral and harmful activities to finance social, education and welfare services.

I think the greatest education we can provide is to make our people aware of the harmful effects of social ills that have affected so many people.

This suggestion, rightly or wrongly, justifies people to drink. I think this is a half-baked, ridiculous and expedient suggestion.

Proarte: This is a stupid suggestion by Rasah MP Anthony Loke. DAP must not play childish politics which brings in so-called Islamic notions of propriety into the political terrain.

In principle, gambling should never be encouraged because it generally drains economic resources from the poorer groups to benefit the billionaire owners of the gambling syndicates.

Revenue from gambling should be used judiciously to benefit all in worthwhile causes and should never have a racial or religious slant.

ACR: Taxes from conventional banking, gambling/betting, sales taxes from alcohol, non-halal meat produce and restaurants, taxes on income arising from dealings with non-Muslim places of worship (taxes on income from coconut supplies to Hindu temples for instance) should be earmarked for the social welfare of non-Muslims.

That said, I believe a fatwa already is in existence that says government revenue (irrespective of source) is halal.

Blackmoon: This move shows the stupidity of DAP's legislators. They prefer to use ‘sin’ money to finance the welfare and education of non-Muslims, including their own members, instead of using ‘good’ money for these purposes.

It would better for Anthony to ask his ‘tokong’, Penang Chief Minster Lim Guan Eng, to return the newly purchased Mercedes S300L and get a Camry. RM150,000 in ‘good’ money could be saved and used for the purpose.

Wira: I support this proposal fully. Please include all sin taxes like tax from the sale of alcohol and the service tax collected from non-halal restaurants and outlets.

Let us not pollute the money used by Umno Muslims. Also print separate currencies to be used by Muslims and the infidels so that money from pork sellers will be touched by Perkasa and Umno members.

Louis: I hope that the likes of our holier-than-thou personalities like Ibrahim Ali and Hasan Ali comment on ‘sin’ money. Enlighten the public whether it is sinful to use such money.

Caripasal: Perkasa and Umno should organise a mega demo urging the government not to use sin tax money for Muslims. Since zakat is used for Muslims, money from sin tax should be reserved for non-Muslims.

Perhaps we should have a quota system that the tax money contributed by a particular race goes back to that race (since Malaysia is a champion of the quota system)?

CiViC: Checkmate! Let's see how BN defends this call, after all zakat is already exclusive for Muslims, and at in the wake of recent racial and religious tensions, Umno which claims to champion Islam along with Perkasa, should support this.

MfM: Well, if the government is serious about helping the rakyat, abolish gambling altogether. People will have more money to spend on food, rent and education.

If that's (RM6.3 billion) just the tax alone, can you imagine the money put back into people's pockets if it was banned completely?

Hardcore gamblers can go to Singapore if they want. We want to stop the poor from gambling their meagre amounts of money away in all these 4D, 5D and other 'D' outlets.

Democrat: Come on DAP, what kind of bulls**t is this? Just because Perkasa and Umno want us all to split, even you are being reckless.

So should Buddhists and Hindus not be given revenue earned from beef sales? This is a narrow and chauvinistic way of looking at things. We voted you to represent our interests, and not split the nation.


The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. Over the past one year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now .