The National Monument (Tugu Negara) is a symbol of respect and honour to the soldiers who had sacrificed their lives to defend the integrity, sovereignty and peace of the country.

Tourists and locals are also both familiar with the landmark, since it was first erected 50 years ago on Feb 8, 1966.

Yet, recently, the monument has come under scrutiny after Islamic religious authorities said that landmarks in the shape of living beings are haram (prohibited).

This issue was first brought up when Perak deputy mufti Zamri Hashim reportedly said that erecting a replica of an eagle was haram as it resembled a living being.

Malaysiakini spoke to several members of the public to find out what they thought about the possible demolition of the National Monument, and they were all strongly against such an action being taken.

One of those who spoke to Malaysiakini, Mohammad Khalid, said that the National Monument had historical value and should not be politicised.

"Logically, the question of demolishing it is not relevant as it's a monument in remembrance of those who fought for the country, and it also has historical value so it should not be politicised through religion," he said.

His sentiment was echoed by Mohammad Kamal Zaman who wanted the landmark to remain as a tribute to those who fought for the country.

If such statues were haram, he asked, why was this issue only brought up now, and not long ago?

"It's not reasonable (for it to be destroyed) because it is a national treasure. If they wanted to destroy it, why not long ago? Why only now?" he asked.

Farah Hanim also argued that the monument is a piece of history which the future generation should be able to enjoy.

Nur Amira also felt the same way about the historical value of the monument, saying that people should come forward to defend the statue.

However, they also disagreed with the estimated cost of RM650 million for the Taman Tugu project and said that there were many other things the government should consider.

"The cost is so high and if it only brings wastage, what is the point," queried Salina Fauzi.

For Mohammad Khalid, the project has some pros and cons, saying that it would be better if the cost of the project could be reduced.

"There are many other infrastructures in Malaysia which need restoration," he said.

On Sunday, Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak had announced that the National Monument and its surroundings would be turned into a 66-acre urban rainforest park with an estimated cost of RM650 million.