It is time Dr M differentiates Jews from Zionists
COMMENT | At the outset, let me make it clear that as far as the Palestinian cause is concerned, I am on the same page as Dr Mahathir Mohamad, although I cannot vouch for his consistency on all the other non-Muslim liberation causes in the rest of the world.
What is disturbing is that through the years, we have witnessed Mahathir’s deliberate refusal to make any distinction between the Jewish people and the ideology of Zionism. This has huge consequences for how our prime minister stands on racism and racial discrimination in our own country...
COMMENT | At the outset, let me make it clear that as far as the Palestinian cause is concerned, I am on the same page as Dr Mahathir Mohamad, although I cannot vouch for his consistency on all the other non-Muslim liberation causes in the rest of the world.
What is disturbing is that through the years, we have witnessed Mahathir’s deliberate refusal to make any distinction between the Jewish people and the ideology of Zionism. This has huge consequences for how our prime minister stands on racism and racial discrimination in our own country.
Those who have followed his political career will note the continuity in his ethos and it was not unexpected that he should once again create a similar rumpus recently on the international stage by conflating Jews with Zionism.
Unashamedly racist paradigm
Mahathir’s first claim to fame (or rather, notoriety) was the publication of his “Malay Dilemma” after the May 13, 1969, racial riots in Kuala Lumpur. It was banned by the then Tunku Abdul Rahman–led government when it first appeared, and Mahathir was expelled from the ruling Umno. Apart from being an academic embarrassment because of its unashamedly racist paradigm, it was clearly “seditious” by the definition of the government-of-the-day in its undermining of sacred constitutional provisions:
“…the Malays are the rightful owners of Malaya… immigrants (read non-Malay Malaysians) are guests until properly absorbed… immigrants are not truly absorbed until they have abandoned the language and culture of their past.”
Mahathir’s ‘Malay Dilemma’ was an instant hit among the emergent state capitalists in Umno who were hungry for power since it provided the instant recipe for them to rally populist support for their bid for power just before May 13, 1969. It was the time-tested recipe for opportunistic politicians to use ‘race’ as the rallying cry for political support just as Hitler’s racist polemic, “Mein Kampf” had provided the model for such a political route.
Since the demise of Hitler and his race-steeped ideology and the price paid in blood by the freedom-loving peoples of the world, racism, racial discrimination and other forms of intolerance have been outlawed in the world community by the Universal Declaration on Human Rights 1948, the International Convention on the Eradication of Racial Discrimination (Icerd) 1965 and the World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance (WCAR) in 2001.
Although Malaysia has yet to ratify Icerd, we are signatories to all these UN treaties.
Glad to be labelled anti-Semitic!
But why is Mahathir so recalcitrant about his blatantly racist attitude towards Jewish people as an ethnic community?
“I am glad to be labelled anti-Semitic,” Mahathir wrote in 2012 on his personal blog. “How can I be otherwise when the Jews who so often talk of the horrors they suffered during the Holocaust, show the same Nazi cruelty and hard-heartedness.”
He wrote in his 1970 book “The Malay Dilemma” that “the Jews are not merely hook-nosed, but understand money instinctively.” He was not embarrassed about repeating this recently on international cable TV.
Not all Jews support Zionism
Much of Malaysians’ antipathy towards Israel can be attributed to our government’s longstanding support for the Palestinian cause. But Mahathir’s rancour extends far beyond geopolitics, spanning anti-Semitism of yesteryears including alleging international Jewish conspiracies to blaming the 1997 Asian financial crisis on a Jew, George Soros:
“The Jews rule this world by proxy,” he told the Organization of Islamic Cooperation summit in 2003.
If Mahathir had studied abroad as I have, he would have come across many Jewish academics, students and politicians who are anti-Zionist activists. One of the most notable anti-Zionists and pro-Palestinian activists is, of course, Noam Chomsky. There is even a Palestinian solidarity group called Jews for Justice for Palestinians (JfJfP) based in Britain that advocates human and civil rights, and economic and political freedom, for the Palestinian people.
It opposes the current policy of Israel towards the Palestinian territories, particularly the territories of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and seeks a change in their political status. The membership of JfJfP is primarily made up of British Jews.
Zionism is itself a racist nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine. Certainly, not all Jews support Zionism, nor do they support Israel’s discriminatory and repressive actions against Palestinians.
More Jews live outside of Israel and not every inhabitant of Israel is Jewish; there are also many non-Jews living in Israel. Many Jews, both living in Israel and elsewhere, support a Palestinian state alongside Israel as a possible solution to the conflict. In other words, not all Jews identify with Zionism and it is mischievous to conflate 'Jews' with 'Israelis' and 'Zionists' just as it is wrong to say that “all ethnic Chinese in Malaysia are rich” or that “all Chinese must be held responsible for the persecution of the Uighurs in Xinjiang, China” .
Mahathir’s stereotyping of ethnic Chinese
Much of Mahathir’s portrayal of Chinese Malaysians echoes his stereotypical anti-Semitic slurs. In his ‘Malay Dilemma’, Mahathir describes Malaysia’s Chinese as “predatory immigrants” who exhibit an “unlimited acquisitiveness” that threatens the “complete Sinicization of the economy.” They are mistrusted as disloyal and mercenary, enriching themselves at the expense of the country’s other communities. Has he ever shown remorse and rectified his racist thesis in the “Malay Dilemma”?
Ostensibly to “correct the racial imbalance”, the New Economic Policy has provided a carte blanche for the new Malay ruling class to amass wealth in the name of their “race”. Mahathir has justified this blatantly racist policy thus:
“The best way to keep the shares in bumiputera hands is to hand them over to the bumiputeras most capable of retaining them, which means the well-to-do.”
Today, race has been so deeply institutionalized that it is a key factor determining benefits from government development policies, bids for business contracts, education policy, social policy, cultural policy, entry into educational institutions, discounts for purchasing houses and other official policies. Practically every aspect of Malaysian life is permeated by the so-called “Bumiputera policy” based on Malay-centrism.
No wonder the time is not ripe to ratify Icerd
In the decades since, Mahathir has continued to resort to racial chauvinism whenever popular support has ebbed, stirring anxiety about Chinese investment and immigration following disappointing electoral showings in 2008 and 2013. He castigated Najib for “giving too much to the Chinese” after the disastrous GE13 results.
The recent anti-Icerd rallies organized by Umno and PAS have now given the prime minister the excuse to say the country is not ready to ratify Icerd. The real question is: is Mahathir ready to eradicate racism, racial discrimination and related intolerances from his own mental paradigm?
As someone has said, “Wisdom doesn't necessarily come with age. Sometimes age just shows up all by itself!”
KUA KIA SOONG is the adviser of Suaram.
The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
In any deal, compromises are inevitable. You give some, you take some. The other Party gives some and takes some.In the Middle East , for example, BOTH Israelis and Palestinians must give some; and take some.. Otherwise, there will NEVER be peace. In BREXIT, there is a huge debate in UK Parliament; and there is equally a huge debate in the EU (which consists of 27 nations !) Among UK Parliamentarians there are diverse views on how the BREXIT deal could be done. In the EU, there are also diverse views on the same subject.It is IMPOSSIBLE to satisfy all parties on all issues. They must agree to give some and take some. In the Malaysia-Singapore tussle, there are problems; and they can only be resolved by compromises ( give-and-take ). But on the Water Agreement, is it possible to reverse it? Undoubtedly 3 cents for a thousand gallons of raw water is unreasonable! But the tricky problem is that it was an AGREEMENT cemented donkey years ago. Could you break an Agreement. In the law of contract, as far as I see it, a contract is a contract is a contract! IF it could be broken at will, , then what is the pirpose of a having a contract? It is rather sad and regrettable that it is a bad contract. But, in the 1920s. even ONE cent could buy things! Even in the 1970s, a single house in Taman Midah ( Bolton Garden then ) was only $ 15,000.00! In Lucky Garden, Bangsar, a single storey house ( corner lot ) was $20,000.00 ! So, times have changed; prices have rocketed! Can you compare situations then and now ? What are the prices of houses now ? After the Japanese Occupation in the then Malaya 10 cents was a huge amount! But, as a caveat (?), neighbours like Malaysia and Singapore, could give and take, water agreement notwithstanding! But, never demand; it is bad manners, In all situations, give and take to make peace. In the Middle East, BREXIT in UK-EU, Water Agreement in Malaysia-Singapore, cut a deal! Nobody can have everything! If so, it makes nonsense of negotiation.Yes, the rule of law must always prevail.
Respect Dr. Kua for his objective article on anti-racism, the difference between Jews and Zionism. It is too simplistic to say that all Chniese are rich and all Malays are poor. There are many poor Chinese people just like there are many poor Malays. Not all Chinese sell fried mee just like not all Malays sell nasi lemak! And not all Indians sell roti canai, for that matter! To condemn all Jews is wrong . One swallow does not Summer make. You see one swallow, you should not say that Summer has arrived! Similarly, you should not assume that all British people are drunkards and sleep just above the pub! Do they ? Weak leaders use race, religion and even royalty to enhance their popularity! Racism, in any nation, not just Malaysia alone, is very bad. Respect all races. Respect all religions. Pursue your career with all your own effort; never use race and religion. Hard work pays! Use your brain which God has given you to the best of your ability.
Mr. Kua, u are not an expert of Palestinian issue. Stop this crap. U are alway so fill of crap trying to confuse the people.
Report this comment
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This action cannot be undone.