Decision on Na'imah's application over legal questions set for Aug 12

The Kuala Lumpur High Court today fixed Aug 12 to deliver its decision on an application by Na'imah Abdul Khalid, the widow of the late former finance minister Daim Zainuddin, to review the Sessions Court’s decision that dismissed her request to refer legal questions in the undeclared assets case.

Justice K Muniandy set the date after hearing submissions from deputy public prosecutor Law Chin How and counsel Gurdial Singh Nijar, who represented Na'imah (above).

Earlier, Law submitted that a case cited by the applicant had been taken out of context to sustain the notion that she, as a witness, is alleged to have a right to remain silent in the course of investigation.

"However, Section 30(5) of the MACC Act 2009 stated that any person has no right to remain silent when he or she is required to assist an investigation.

"Therefore, the applicant is under a legal obligation to assist MACC in respect of the asset declaration of her late husband by complying with the notice under section 36(1)(b) of the MACC Act," he said.

Law said the question relating to Section 30(5) of the MACC Act raised by the applicant does not have a direct bearing on the matter of dispute or charge before this court.

"The applicant has failed to show to this court that Section 30(5) of the MACC Act is a clear transgression of the constitutional principles," he said.

Section 30(5) of the MACC Act states that a person to whom a written notice has been given under paragraph (1)(c) shall, in his statement, furnish and disclose truthfully all information required under the notice which is within his knowledge, or which is available to him, and shall not refuse to furnish or disclose the information on the ground that it tends to incriminate him or his spouse.

‘Just a witness’

Gurdial, however, contended that his client was called to assist in the investigation against her late husband, strictly in her capacity as a witness and at all material times, she was never regarded as a co-suspect.

On Jan 23, 2024, Na’imah was charged in the Sessions Court for failure to comply with a notice to declare her assets, which included Menara Ilham and several other properties in Kuala Lumpur and Penang.

She was charged under Section 36(2) of the MACC Act 2009, which carries a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment or a fine of RM100,000.

On Feb 29, 2024, Na’imah filed an application to refer questions of law on Sections 30(5), 36(2) and 62 of the MACC Act 2009, as well as Section 32(3)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (Amla) 2001 to the High Court.

However, on Feb 18 this year, Sessions Court judge Azura Alwi dismissed Na’imah’s application on the ground that it disclosed no merit, holding that no constitutional questions arose for determination.

- Bernama

Probe into PM classified as NFA, Na'imah's lawyers outraged

Na'imah wants IPCC to probe cops for not investigating PM

Na'imah's counsel: Court's refusal to refer legal questions denied fundamental right

Is MACC playing musical chairs with law, lawyers ask after second seizure