Kok defends Karpal
The DAP deplores the unlawful acts of Umno members, including former Selangor menteri besar Dr Khir Toyo, engaging in unlawful acts of holding demonstrations outside its party chairman Karpal Singh's office and home without police permits.
The DAP deplores the unlawful acts of Umno members, including former Selangor menteri besar Dr Khir Toyo, engaging in unlawful acts of holding demonstrations outside its party chairman Karpal Singh's office and home without police permits.
Selangor exco member and Seputeh MP, Teresa Kok has also called on the government to put a complete stop to such regretful and shameful actions immediately.
"The actions taken by Umno, including Dr Khir, who went all the way from Selangor to Penang, are attempts to intimidate and hound Karpal with the intent to deprive him of his right to free speech," she said.
"The unlawful actions by Umno is clearly designed to seek cheap political publicity and sensationalism. The hidden objective by Umno and the BN is to create divisiveness and hostilities among Malaysians by demonising a leading figure in Pakatan Rakyat," she said.
Kok said the rulers have lost their constitutional immunity because of Umno and BN, and this qualifies Karpal's statement that it was possible to name the sultan of Perak in the suit regarding BN wresting control of the silver state.
She reiterated Karpal was merely exercising his right to freedom of speech as enshrined in the Constitution.
"The right to file suits against any person is also an absolute right and cannot be questioned. In no way is it rude or disrespectful of royalty.
Karpal is entitled to his legal opinion
"It is just a legal opinion by a very senior and well-respected lawyer to which we are sure the sultan, being a man of law and being the former lord president, will take no offence or issue," said Kok.
Karpal, had in a press conference on Wednesday, said he stood by what he said in that the
sultan can be taken to court
in his official capacity.
"There were amendments to the constitution in 1993 when the rulers were stripped of their immunity and hence can be subjected to civil redress.
"I know and I think he (Perak Sultan Raja Azlan Shah) knows (this as he is) a former lord president. There is nothing treacherous about it," the veteran lawyer had said.
Kok said on Friday, it was clear that Karpal is not suing the sultan personally and as such it was proof that he was clearly making a legal opinion only.
"The Pakatan suit was filed last Friday by others and it did not name the sultan as a respondent."
"Let the courts be the forum to settle the dispute now that the matter is before the courts," said the Seputeh MP.


Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This action cannot be undone.