NEWS

'Will Najib accuse AG of using doctored evidence?'

Published
Modified 5 Jul 2015, 2:25 am

Is Najib Abdul Razak going to accuse Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail of basing a corruption investigation against the prime minister on doctored or unsubstantiated evidence?

This was a question posed by PAS deputy president Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man, after Najib yesterday dismissed the allegation which was first reported by Wall Street Journal ( WSJ ) as " unsubstantiated, outrageous and false ".

The prime minister had also cast doubt on the allegation by alluding to a separate corruption allegation involving 1MDB which was based on PetroSaudi International's leaked information which he claimed was "doctored".

"Is the attorney-general ( photo ) also going to be accused on investigating 1MDB based on false information perpetrated by a former PetroSaudi employee as had been played up?" he said in a statement today.

In the latest allegation, WSJ claimed that US$700 million (RM2.6 billion) of 1MDB's fund was deposited into Najib's private banking accounts shortly before the 13th General Election.

WSJ had defended its report, stating that it was based on Malaysian government investigation papers which it said was submitted to the attorney-general and was also sighted by Najib himself.

Coincidentally today, Abdul Gani confirmed receiving documents relating to allegations that 1MDB's fund was deposited into Najib's bank accounts from a special taskforce comprising the police, Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission, and Bank Negara.

Tuan Ibrahim questioned whether the documents from "Malaysian government investigators" used by WSJ for the report was the same as the ones Abdul Gani confirmed he received.

This is after Najib and his allies yesterday attempted to discredit WSJ 's source of information.

"Regardless, Abdul Gani's confirmation had indirectly given credence to WSJ 's compared to Najib's denial," said Tuan Ibrahim.

As such, Tuan Ibrahim urged Najib to gone on leave.

Related reports

Thai-M'sian police to discuss Justo next week

'Will Najib accuse AG of using doctored evidence?'

PAS leader: Accusations against Najib defy logic

Zahid urges PM to sue WSJ over allegations

AG confirms seeing docs on PM graft allegations

Now Jews blamed for PM's corruption woes

DPM wants accusations against Najib investigated

Lawyer: PM's threat to nail critics an abuse of power

Flurry of police reports over PM graft claim

Umno blogger: Sue Dr M too if he is mastermind

'No outright denial by Najib raises red flag'

Najib Razak - 'Bapa' financial scandals

Prove not your bank accounts, PM told

G'kan Youth to PM: Prove 'nothing 2 hide' with facts

WSJ: Our report solid, Najib saw probe papers

Najib may take legal action against WSJ

Abdul Rahman, WSJ is not Utusan

PM, if Wall Street Journal lied, sue them!

'Even Najib can't be this stupid. Or can he?'

Depression can be cured with bitter pill of truth

Najib, no ‘fair go’ if you commit wrongdoing

Share this story

Comments

By posting a comment, you agree to our Terms & Conditions as stipulated in full here

TERMS & CONDITIONS

Foul language, profanity, vulgarity, slanderous, personal attack, threatening, sexually-orientated comments or the use of any method of communication that may violate any law or create needless unpleasantness will not be tolerated. Antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be suspended. Violators run the risk of also being blocked permanently.

REPORT VIOLATORS

Please use the report feature that is available below each comment to flag offending comments for our moderators to take action. Do not take matters in your own hands to avoid unpleasant and unnecessary exchanges that may result in your own suspension or ban.