De facto
 
 law minister Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz said he issued a
 
 <a href="/news/72740" target="_blank">
 denial
 </a>
 
 on behalf of the chief justice in relation to the explosive 'Lingam tape' revelations because "I am his minister".


 <img align="right" alt="" border="0" height="254" hspace="7" src="http://mk-cdn.mkini.net/96/a7ef443105537a762b87a5850a8c3eac.jpg" style="WIDTH: 200px; HEIGHT: 254px" width="200"/>


 "I am his minister. I am the minister in charge of legal affairs. He is clever enough to know that the reporters will ask me for a response," Nazri explained when contacted today to explain his intervention in the matter.


 Most of the newspapers today had reported his comments on behalf of Chief Justice Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim, who himself has chosen to remain silent.


 On why Ahmad Fairuz has been evading the media, Nazri said it was because the former is not answerable to the press.


 Nazri, the minister in the Prime Minister's Department, also slammed the media for "rumour-mongering" in giving widespread publicity to the video recording,
 
 <a href="/news/72579" target="_blank">
 released
 </a>
 
 by PKR
 
 de facto
 
 leader Anwar Ibrahim last Wednesday.


 The eight-minute edited video showed senior lawyer VK Lingam talking on the phone, apparently brokering the appointment of judges with Ahmad Fairuz, who was the chief judge of Malaya in 2002 when the recording was said to have been made.


 Although only Lingam is seen in the video clip, the context of the conversation indicates that the other person at the end was Ahmad Fairuz.


 <img align="left" alt="" border="0" height="146" hspace="7" src="http://mk-cdn.mkini.net/97/77390db63bf7c7ef3c2d8ece0f61dc22.gif" style="WIDTH: 219px; HEIGHT: 146px" width="219"/>
 After maintaining silence for two days, the chief justice last Friday told
 
 Malaysiakini
 
 in a two-paragraph fax that he had
 
 <a href="/news/72710" target="_blank">
 no comment
 </a>
 
 on the matter.


 The next day, Nazri told the media that Ahmad Fairuz had contacted him to deny that he was the other party in the telephone conversation.


 Earlier efforts to contact Lingam for comment were futile as he was said to be abroad until the end of the month.


 
 
 Bar showing hostility?
 
 


 Nazri also branded the Bar Council's
 
 <a href="/news/72735" target="_blank">
 plan
 </a>
 
 to hold a march on Wednesday to press for investigation into the scandal as an attempt to display 'hostility' and as support of the opposition.


 "Lawyers are officials of the court - they have a place in the society. They shouldn't behave like the opposition," argued the clearly annoyed minister.


 <img align="left" alt="" border="0" height="146" hspace="7" src="http://mk-cdn.mkini.net/73/9fa0567098ea250a46bb877ef850bbc3.gif" style="WIDTH: 219px; HEIGHT: 146px" width="219"/>
 He said lawyers should send a memorandum to him or Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi as this would be a "proper manner" of response.


 "If they want to stoop so low and go there like (an) opposition demonstration, certainly they will lose my respect because I have been having a very good relationship with the Bar.


 "Why do they want to lower their standard, unless they want to show they are hostile (to the government) and (that they) support the opposition."


 Saying that the Bar should remain an independent body, he equated lawyers joining the march to the conduct of opposition politicians Lim Kit Siang and Anwar.


 Nazri said he was not questioning the lawyers' right to march and that he was not calling for the plan to be scrapped, but said he was not happy with the choice of action.


 <img align="left" height="64" hspace="5" src="http://mk-cdn.mkini.net/83/2e70ce887db682da3c4605924a8dc481.jpg" width="64"/>
 In an immediate reaction, Bar Council chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan responded by saying that the present situation was a matter of justice, not politics.


 "The expression of views seemingly contrary to the government's position may be wrongly labelled as 'a display of hostility' in autocratic countries, but in truth (and in the free world) it is called democracy," she said.


 "In any event, how can our call for the strengthening of the judiciary ever be only the position of opposition parties when surely it must be the government's stand too," she added.


 
 
 March to start at 11am
 
 




 The lawyers plan to march from the Palace of Justice to the Prime Minister's Department in Putrajaya to submit a memorandum calling for a royal commission of inquiry to be set up.


 <img align="right" alt="" border="0" height="294" hspace="7" src="http://mk-cdn.mkini.net/76/7e01e09275c78ba078a5fda2a39c780b.jpg" style="WIDTH: 260px; HEIGHT: 294px" width="260"/>
 They are expected to be joined by members of NGOs, political parties and student groups.


 In a statement today, the Bar Council - the governing body of the 13,500-strong Malaysian Bar - said those who wish to join the march should meet at the stairs of the Palace of Justice at 11am on Wednesday.


 Alternatively, participants can use chartered buses that will be at Dataran Merdeka in Kuala Lumpur at 9am that morning.


 At an emergency meeting on Saturday, the Bar Council had also decided to hold an extraordinary general meeting on Oct 6 to look into the rot in the judiciary since the 1988 crisis.


 
 <a href="/news/72772" target="_blank">
 SPECIAL REPORT: The Lingam tape
 </a>

<img align="left" height="64" hspace="5" src="http://mk-cdn.mkini.net/97/6e2c8e42edd96807b5d68c327511b88c.gif" width="64"/>
 updated with Bar Council reaction
 

The

 de facto

law minister explains why he is doing the talking for the chief justice, who has declined comment on alleged involvement in the scandal.

Nazri: Because I'm his minister

~RM12

Share

ABOUT

DIGITAL NETWORK

TERMS OF USE

GENERAL LINE

SUBSCRIPTION / TECH SUPPORT

EDITORIAL

LOCATION

RSS FEEDS

DAILY NEWS DIGEST